The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study

BackgroundThe aim of the study is to describe the work pattern of personal care workers (PCWs) in nursing homes. This knowledge is important for staff performance appraisal, task allocation and scheduling. It will also support funding allocation based on activities.MethodsA time-motion study was conducted in 2010 at two Australian nursing homes. The observation at Site 1 was between the hours of 7:00 and 14:00 or 15:00 for 14 days. One PCW was observed on each day. The observation at Site 2 was from 10:00 to 17:00 for 16 days. One PCW working on a morning shift and another one working on an afternoon shift were observed on each day. Fifty-eight work activities done by PCWs were grouped into eight categories. Activity time, frequency, duration and the switch between two consecutive activities were used as measurements to describe the work pattern.ResultsPersonal care workers spent about 70.0% of their time on four types of activities consistently at both sites: direct care (30.7%), indirect care (17.6%), infection control (6.4%) and staff break (15.2%). Oral communication was the most frequently observed activity. It could occur independently or concurrently with other activities. At Site 2, PCWs spent significantly more time than their counterparts at Site 1 on oral communication (Site 1: 47.3% vs. Site 2: 63.5%, P = 0.003), transit (Site 1: 3.4% vs. Site 2: 5.5%, P < 0.001) and others (Site 1: 0.5% vs. Site 2: 1.8%, P < 0.001). They spent less time on documentation (Site 1: 4.1% vs. Site 2: 2.3%, P < 0.001). More than two-thirds of the observed activities had a very short duration (1 minute or less). Personal care workers frequently switched within or between oral communication, direct and indirect care activities.ConclusionsAt both nursing homes, direct care, indirect care, infection control and staff break occupied the major part of a PCW’s work, however oral communication was the most time consuming activity. Personal care workers frequently switched between activities, suggesting that looking after the elderly in nursing homes is a busy and demanding job.

[1]  B. Bowers,et al.  How nurses manage time and work in long-term care. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  D. Simel,et al.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. , 1994, Health services research.

[3]  Mariko Yamamoto,et al.  Impact of the stage of dementia on the time required for bathing-related care: a pilot study in a Japanese nursing home. , 2004, International journal of nursing studies.

[4]  D. Pelletier,et al.  Work sampling: valuable methodology to define nursing practice patterns. , 2003, Nursing & health sciences.

[5]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[6]  Johanna Westbrook,et al.  A comparison of self-reported and observational work sampling techniques for measuring time in nursing tasks , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  Jill Manthorpe,et al.  An International Review of the Long-Term Care Workforce , 2005, Journal of aging & social policy.

[8]  V. Upenieks,et al.  Work sampling. Assessing nursing efficiency. , 1998, Nursing management.

[9]  Ping Yu,et al.  Development and Testing of a Work Measurement Tool to Assess Caregivers' Activities In Residential Aged Care Facilities , 2010, MedInfo.

[10]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Design, application and testing of the Work Observation Method by Activity Timing (WOMBAT) to measure clinicians' patterns of work and communication , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Johanna I Westbrook,et al.  How much time do nurses have for patients? a longitudinal study quantifying hospital nurses' patterns of task time distribution and interactions with health professionals , 2011, BMC health services research.

[12]  Ping Yu,et al.  Does the introduction of an electronic nursing documentation system in a nursing home reduce time on documentation for the nursing staff? , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  M. Wright,et al.  Differences in midwives' approaches to pain relief in labour. , 1998, Midwifery.

[14]  R. Mcconigley,et al.  Descriptive, exploratory study of the role of nursing assistants in Australian residential aged care facilities: The example of pain management , 2009, Australasian journal on ageing.

[15]  Ping Yu,et al.  How nursing staff spend their time on activities in a nursing home: an observational study. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  G. Becker,et al.  Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative - an observational study at a university hospital , 2010, BMC health services research.

[17]  Paul Cornell,et al.  Transforming Nursing Workflow, Part 1: The Chaotic Nature of Nurse Activities , 2010, The Journal of nursing administration.

[18]  Ping Yu,et al.  The changes in caregivers' perceptions about the quality of information and benefits of nursing documentation associated with the introduction of an electronic documentation system in a nursing home , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[19]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  P Wirth,et al.  Comparability of Two Methods of Time and Motion Study Used in a Clinical Setting: Work Sampling and Continuous Observation , 1977, Medical care.

[21]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Understanding the work of intensive care nurses: a time and motion study. , 2012, Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.

[22]  Christine Duffield,et al.  Documentation and the transfer of clinical information in two aged care settings. , 2005, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[23]  Kevin J O'Leary,et al.  Where did the day go?--a time-motion study of hospitalists. , 2010, Journal of hospital medicine.