Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints

A number of Conversation Analytic studies have documented that question recipients have a variety of ways to push against the constraints that questions impose on them. This article explores the concept of transformative answers – answers through which question recipients retroactively adjust the question posed to them. Two main sorts of adjustments are discussed: question term transformations and question agenda transformations. It is shown that the operations through which interactants implement term transformations are different from the operations through which they implement agenda transformations. Moreover, term-transforming answers resist only the question’s design, while agenda-transforming answers effectively resist both design and agenda, thus implying that agenda-transforming answers resist more strongly than design-transforming answers. The implications of these different sorts of transformations for alignment and affi liation are then explored. ( Conversation Analysis , social interaction , alignment , affi liation , Japanese , evasion ) *

[1]  R. Rooij,et al.  On Polar Questions , 2003 .

[2]  Susan L. Ehrlich,et al.  “I think that's not an assumption you ought to make”: Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony , 2006, Language in Society.

[3]  P. Drew.  'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation , 1997 .

[4]  Galina B. Bolden.  Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation , 2009 .

[5]  T. Stivers,et al.  Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second Position , 2005 .

[6]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[7]  Zsuzsanna Fagyal,et al.  Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token ja and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective , 2008 .

[8]  M. Hayashi.  An overview of the question–response system in Japanese , 2010 .

[9]  Geoffrey Raymond,et al.  The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction , 2005 .

[10]  J. Chatwin.  Conversation analysis. , 2004, Complementary therapies in medicine.

[11]  Gene H. Lerner,et al.  Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-Questions , 2009 .

[12]  M. Hayashi.  Marking a ‘noticing of departure’ in talk: Eh-prefaced turns in Japanese conversation , 2009 .

[13]  P. Drew.  Structures of Social Action: Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences , 1985 .

[14]  E. Schegloff.  Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[15]  T. Stivers,et al.  An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation , 2010 .

[16]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[17]  Elise Kärkkäinen,et al.  Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think , 2003 .

[18]  Geoffrey Raymond.  Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding , 2003, American Sociological Review.