STraM: a framework for strategic national freight transport modeling

To achieve carbon emission targets worldwide, decarbonization of the freight transport sector will be an important factor. To this end, national governments must make plans that facilitate this transition. National freight transport models are a useful tool to assess what the effects of various policies and investments may be. The state of the art consists of very detailed, static models. While useful for short-term policy assessment, these models are less suitable for the long-term planning necessary to facilitate the transition to low-carbon transportation in the upcoming decades. In this paper, we fill this gap by developing a framework for strategic national freight transport modeling, which we call STraM, and which can be characterized as a multi-period stochastic network design model, based on a multimodal freight transport formulation. In STraM, we explicitly include several aspects that are lacking in state-of-the art national freight transport models: the dynamic nature of long-term planning, as well as new, low-carbon fuel technologies and long-term uncertainties in the development of these technologies. We illustrate our model using a case study of Norway and discuss the resulting insights. In particular, we demonstrate the relevance of modeling multiple time periods, the importance of including long-term uncertainty in technology development, and the efficacy of carbon pricing.

[1]  Tchetin Kazak European Green Deal , 2022, Yearbook of the Law Department.

[2]  F. R. Wood,et al.  Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5–2°C , 2020, Climate Policy.

[3]  S. Møller-Holst,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of freight railway electrification by overhead line, hydrogen and batteries: Case studies in Norway and USA , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit.

[4]  Christian S. Mjøsund,et al.  Crossing Borders and Expanding Modal Shift Measures: Effects on Mode Choice and Emissions from Freight Transport in the Nordics , 2020, Sustainability.

[5]  H. Meersman,et al.  Freight transport models: Ready to support transport policy of the future? , 2019, Transport Policy.

[6]  N. N. Pereira,et al.  A review of the use of LNG versus HFO in maritime industry , 2019, Marine Systems & Ocean Technology.

[7]  How transport demand will change by 2050 , 2019, ITF Transport Outlook.

[8]  Tom Van Woensel,et al.  A green intermodal service network design problem with travel time uncertainty , 2016 .

[9]  S. Grønland Cost models for freight transport and logistics – base year 2012 , 2015 .

[10]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Impact and relevance of transit disturbances on planning in intermodal container networks using disturbance cost analysis , 2013 .

[11]  I. B. Hovi,et al.  Commodity Flow Matrices for Norway , 2013 .

[12]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe , 2012, Transportation.

[13]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe , 2012 .

[14]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  The Aggregate–Disaggregate–Aggregate (ADA) Freight Model System , 2008 .

[15]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Application and Validation of Dynamic Freight Simulation–Assignment Model to Large-Scale Intermodal Rail Network , 2008 .

[16]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice , 2007 .

[17]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  GERARD DE JONG,et al.  National and International Freight Transport Models: An Overview and Ideas for Future Development , 2004 .

[19]  Julia L. Higle,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty in Linear Programming , 2003, Interfaces.

[20]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions , 2001 .

[21]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[22]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  A DSS For Modelling Logistic Chains in Freight Transport Policy Analysis , 1998 .

[23]  M Beuthe,et al.  TRANSPORTATION POLICY ANALYSIS WITH A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM: THE VIRTUAL NETWORK OF FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IN EUROPE. IN: TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1996 .

[24]  Michael Florian,et al.  A Model for the Strategic Planning of National Freight Transportation by Rail , 1990, Transp. Sci..

[25]  R. Wets,et al.  Stochastic programming , 1989 .

[26]  T G Crainic,et al.  Strategic planning of freight transportation in Brazil: methodology and applications; part 1: project summary , 1989 .

[27]  Teodor Gabriel Crainic,et al.  A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows , 1987, Transp. Sci..

[28]  John R. Birge,et al.  The value of the stochastic solution in stochastic linear programs with fixed recourse , 1982, Math. Program..

[29]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[30]  Network Design with Applications to Transportation and Logistics , 2021 .

[31]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Comprehensive Versus Simplified Models , 2013 .

[32]  Gerard de Jong,et al.  Discrete Mode and Discrete or Continuous Shipment Size Choice in Freight Transport in Sweden , 2009 .

[33]  Teodor Gabriel Crainic,et al.  STRATEGIC PLANNING OF FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION: STAN, AN INTERACTIVE GRAPHIC SYSTEM , 1990 .

[34]  T G Crainic,et al.  STRATEGIC PLANNING OF FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IN BRAZIL: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION, PART 4: SPECIFYING DATA FOR THE STAN SYSTEM: REQUIREMENTS, CONCEPTS, SOURCES AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURES , 1989 .