Hyperspecificity in Visual Implicit Learning: Learning of Spatial Layout Is Contingent on Item Identity Contextual Cuing

Humans conduct visual search faster when the same display is presented for a 2nd time, showing implicit learning of repeated displays. This study examines whether learning of a spatial layout transfers to other layouts that are occupied by items of new shapes or colors. The authors show that spatial context learning is sometimes contingent on item identity. For example, when the training session included some trials with black items and other trials with white items, learning of the spatial layout became specific to the trained color--no transfer was seen when items were in a new color during testing. However, when the training session included only trials in black (or white), learning transferred to displays with a new color. Similar results held when items changed shapes after training. The authors conclude that implicit visual learning is sensitive to trial context and that spatial context learning can be identity contingent.

[1]  Yuji Takeda,et al.  Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  High-capacity spatial contextual memory , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[6]  D. A. Riley,et al.  Stimulus-generalization gradients in chickens reared in monochromatic light and tested with a single wavelength value. , 1971 .

[7]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Implicit learning of ignored visual context. , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Intertrial temporal contextual cuing: association across successive visual search trials guides spatial attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[10]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Jun-ichiro Kawahara,et al.  Transfer of Spatial Context from Visual to Haptic Search , 2003, Perception.

[12]  K. Lashley,et al.  The Pavlovian theory of generalization. , 1946, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Chun,et al.  Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[16]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Joo-Hyun Song,et al.  Spatial context learning in visual search and change detection , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  D. R. Thomas,et al.  Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization. , 1966, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[19]  P. Atchley,et al.  Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity to statistical properties , 1995, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Kramer,et al.  Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  G. Stratton.  University of California publications in psychology , 1976 .

[22]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[23]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Watson,et al.  Conditioned emotional reactions , 1920 .

[26]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[27]  C. Vaidya,et al.  Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[30]  C. H. Honzik,et al.  Degrees of hunger, reward and non-reward, and maze learning in rats, and Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats , 1930 .

[31]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[33]  D. Ariely.  Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  L. Kamin.  Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[35]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[36]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  J. Henderson,et al.  Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .