Homing in on excellence: Dimensions of appraisal in Center of Excellence program evaluations

Excellence has become a watchword for goal setting and assessment in science and technology policy. While the concept has been around for many years in its commonsense meaning, it is now explicitly used for science governance; however, so far little work has been done to detail, operationalize and systematize the dimensions of value present in academic evaluators’ use of the concept. This article is based on a close reading of a mid-term evaluation of several centers of excellence in Sweden, the goal of which is to achieve a detailed understanding of the evaluative components of the concept. By applying template analysis to evaluation documents, seven main components, largely referring to the organizational/institutional aspects of excellence were identified. These are analyzed and used to provide insights for evaluation scholars and practitioners into the tensions and possibilities present in the excellence concept.

[1]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation , 2004 .

[2]  A. Giorgi,et al.  The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure , 1997 .

[3]  Steve Fuller,et al.  The governance of science : ideology and the future of the open society , 2001 .

[4]  Tony Becher The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[5]  A. Goldman,et al.  Knowledge in a Social World , 2001 .

[6]  A. Goldman Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[7]  Grit Laudel,et al.  The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds , 2006 .

[8]  James Stuart Pounder,et al.  Evaluating the Relevance of Quality to Institutional Performance Assessment in Higher Education , 2000 .

[9]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment , 1987 .

[10]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  H. Longino Science as Social Knowledge , 1990 .

[12]  Richard Whitley Changing Governance of the Public Sciences , 2007 .

[13]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The essential tension : selected studies in scientific tradition and change , 1977 .

[14]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Sustainability of incentives for excellent research — The German case , 2009, Scientometrics.

[15]  R. Gillett,et al.  Pitfalls in assessing research performance by grant income , 1991, Scientometrics.

[16]  Veronica Mansilla Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration , 2006 .

[17]  DANBURY TRASH COMPANIES,et al.  Press releases , 2001, Heart Drug.

[18]  Frederick E. Balderston,et al.  Managing Today's University: Strategies for Viability, Change, and Excellence, Second Edition. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1995 .

[19]  David Topper,et al.  The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change , 1979 .

[20]  H. Lacey Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding , 2004 .

[21]  L. Johnston Template analysis. , 1987, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[22]  N.E. WHITEHEAD,et al.  Values in science , 1985, Nature.

[23]  Stefan Hornbostel,et al.  Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity? , 2001, Scientometrics.

[24]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[25]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Scoreboards of research excellence , 2003 .

[26]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  Science, the endless frontier : A report to the President , 2011 .

[27]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2009 .

[28]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development , 1967 .

[29]  Janet Atkinson-Grosjean,et al.  Changes in Academy/Industry/State Relations in Canada: The Creation and Development of the Networks of Centres of Excellence , 2001 .

[30]  P. Shapira,et al.  Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research , 2009 .

[31]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  Creative Knowledge Environments , 2008, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[32]  최인기 수사비평(Rhetorical Criticism)으로 성경 읽기 , 2007 .

[33]  H. Longino The Fate of Knowledge , 2001 .