The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new

Cued recall success varies with what people know and with what they do during an episode. This paper focuses on prior knowledge and disentangles the relative effects of 10 features of words and their relationships on cued recall. Results are reported for correlational and multiple regression analyses of data obtained from free association norms and from 29 experiments. The 10 features were only weakly correlated with each other in the norms and, with notable exceptions, in the experiments. The regression analysis indicated that forward cue-to-target strength explained the most variance, followed by backward target-to-cue strength. Target connectivity and set size explained the next most variance, along with mediated cue-to-target strength. Finally, frequency, concreteness, shared associate strength, and cue set size also contributed significantly to recall. Taken together, indices of prior word knowledge explain 49% of the recall variance. Theoretically driven equations that use free association to predict cued recall were also evaluated. Each equation was designed to condense multiple indices of word interconnectivity into a single predictor.

[1]  D C Rubin,et al.  Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Michael S. Humphreys,et al.  Forward and backward associations in cued recall: Predictions from the encoding specificity principle. , 1975 .

[3]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Encoding context and retrieval conditions as determinants of the effects of natural category size. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Research Design and Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D L Nelson,et al.  One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall , 1992 .

[8]  H. P. Bahrick Two-phase model for prompted recall. , 1970 .

[9]  D. Nelson,et al.  What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. , 1998 .

[11]  D L Nelson,et al.  What is this thing called frequency? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[12]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Associative clustering during recall. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  P. Pirolli,et al.  Spread of activation. , 1984 .

[14]  D L Nelson,et al.  Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[16]  S. Dennis,et al.  What is free association and what does it measure? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Processing implicit and explicit representations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[18]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Encoding context and set size. , 1979 .

[19]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case. , 1995, Psychological review.

[20]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[21]  N. Gee,et al.  Implicit Memory and Word Ambiguity , 1997 .

[22]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Dissociated backward priming effects in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Cue set size effects: Sampling activated associates or cross-target interference? , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[24]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[25]  J. Deese The structure of associations in language and thought , 1966 .

[26]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[28]  D L Nelson,et al.  Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: Set size and word-frequency effects , 1995, Psychological research.