Three-Dimensional In Silico Breast Phantoms for Multimodal Image Simulations

Anatomic simulators have provided researchers with the realistic objects needed to develop and evaluate medical imaging approaches. Today we have new insights into the cellular biology of breast tissues that is driving many new targeted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, including molecular imaging. We report on our initial efforts to build a scalable framework for the construction of realistic 3-D in silico breast phantoms (ISBP) capable of leveraging existing knowledge and yet adaptable to fully integrate future discoveries. The ISBP frames are developed with scalable anatomical shapes and morphologic features as adapted from a rich literature on this topic. Frames are populated with tissue subtypes essential for imaging and object contrast functions are assigned. These data can be resampled to match the intrinsics scales of various imaging modalities; we explore mammography, sonography and computed tomography. Initial comparisons between simulated and clinical images demonstrate reasonable agreement and provides guidance for future development of a more realistic ISBP. An end-to-end simulation of breast images is described to demonstrate techniques for including stochastic variability and deterministic physical principles on which image formation is based.

[1]  Jonathan Mamou,et al.  Perspective on biomedical quantitative ultrasound imaging , 2006, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[2]  John M Boone,et al.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. II. Evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture. , 2002, Medical physics.

[4]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for testing elastography systems. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  T. D. Mast,et al.  Simulation of ultrasonic focus aberration and correction through human tissue. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J C Kent,et al.  Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  K Bliznakova,et al.  A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[9]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[10]  Jonathan Mamou,et al.  Identifying ultrasonic scattering sites from three-dimensional impedance maps. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Report of the task group on reference man , 1979, Annals of the ICRP.

[12]  T. D. Mast,et al.  Simulation of ultrasonic pulse propagation through the abdominal wall. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M Westreich,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  M. Insana Ultrasonic Imaging , 2005 .

[15]  A. Dursun,et al.  Microanatomy of Milk Ducts in the Nipple , 2006, European Surgical Research.

[16]  Sanford H Barsky,et al.  Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited , 2004, Cancer.

[17]  D. Geddes,et al.  Inside the lactating breast: the latest anatomy research. , 2007, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[18]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  N. Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Classification of galactograms with ramification matrices: preliminary results. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[21]  J. Going Ductal-lobar organisation of human breast tissue, its relevance in disease and a research objective: vector mapping of parenchyma in complete breasts (the Astley Cooper project) , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[22]  C. Floyd,et al.  A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Kefah Mokbel,et al.  Mammary ductoscopy: past, present, and future , 2004, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Dragana Brzakovic,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a three-dimensional simulation. III. Modeling and evaluation of the breast ductal network. , 2003, Medical physics.

[25]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Characterization Of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern By Fractal Dimension , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[26]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  Elena F. Brachtel,et al.  Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: three-dimensional patterns and clinical implications , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[28]  G Catanuto,et al.  Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[29]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[30]  J. Going,et al.  Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions , 2004, The Journal of pathology.

[31]  J. Going,et al.  Three dimensional anatomy of complete duct systems in human breast: pathological and developmental implications. , 1996, Journal of clinical pathology.

[32]  P L Carson,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for assessing ultrasonic imaging system performance and for training ultrasonographers: Part II , 1982, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[33]  H Rusinek,et al.  Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  J. Skelton,et al.  Breast Fat and Fallacies: More Than 100 Years of Anatomical Fantasy , 2005, Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association.

[35]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  T. Mohun,et al.  Human breast duct anatomy, the ‘sick lobe’ hypothesis and intraductal approaches to breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[37]  Seiichi Takenoshita,et al.  Computer‐assisted complete three‐dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems , 2001, Cancer.

[38]  J. Vandeput,et al.  Considerations on Anthropometric Measurements of the Female Breast , 2002, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.