Efficient Splitting of Measures and Necklaces

We provide approximation algorithms for two problems, known as NECKLACE SPLITTING and $\epsilon$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING. In the problem $\epsilon$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING, there are $n$ non-atomic probability measures on the interval $[0, 1]$ and $k$ agents. The goal is to divide the interval, via at most $n (k-1)$ cuts, into pieces and distribute them to the $k$ agents in an approximately equitable way, so that the discrepancy between the shares of any two agents, according to each measure, is at most $2 \epsilon / k$. It is known that this is possible even for $\epsilon = 0$. NECKLACE SPLITTING is a discrete version of $\epsilon$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING. For $k = 2$ and some absolute positive constant $\epsilon$, both of these problems are PPAD-hard. We consider two types of approximation. The first provides every agent a positive amount of measure of each type under the constraint of making at most $n (k - 1)$ cuts. The second obtains an approximately equitable split with as few cuts as possible. Apart from the offline model, we consider the online model as well, where the interval (or necklace) is presented as a stream, and decisions about cutting and distributing must be made on the spot. For the first type of approximation, we describe an efficient algorithm that gives every agent at least $\frac{1}{nk}$ of each measure and works even online. For the second type of approximation, we provide an efficient online algorithm that makes $\text{poly}(n, k, \epsilon)$ cuts and an offline algorithm making $O(nk \log \frac{k}{\epsilon})$ cuts. We also establish lower bounds for the number of cuts required in the online model for both problems even for $k=2$ agents, showing that the number of cuts in our online algorithm is optimal up to a logarithmic factor.

[1]  Octav Onicescu,et al.  Un théorème d'existence , 1975 .

[2]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Fair division - from cake-cutting to dispute resolution , 1998 .

[3]  Charles E. Leiserson,et al.  How to assemble tree machines , 1984 .

[4]  Frank Thomson Leighton,et al.  A Framework for Solving VLSI Graph Layout Problems , 1983, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[5]  N. Alon,et al.  The Borsuk-Ulam theorem and bisection of necklaces , 1986 .

[6]  John R. Rice,et al.  A moment problem in ₁ approximation , 1965 .

[7]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  On the Complexity of the Parity Argument and Other Inefficient Proofs of Existence , 1994, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[8]  Francis Edward Su,et al.  Consensus-halving via theorems of Borsuk-Ulam and Tucker , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[9]  Frédéric Meunier,et al.  Simplotopal maps and necklace splitting , 2014, Discret. Math..

[10]  Mark de Longueville,et al.  Splitting multidimensional necklaces , 2006 .

[11]  Alexandros Hollender,et al.  Consensus-Halving: Does It Ever Get Easier? , 2020, EC.

[12]  Joel H. Spencer,et al.  Deterministic Discrepancy Minimization , 2011, Algorithmica.

[13]  Robert Tijdeman On a Distribution Problem in Finite and Countable Sets , 1973, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[14]  Charles H. Goldberg,et al.  Bisection of Circle Colorings , 1985 .

[15]  N. Alon Non-constructive proofs in Combinatorics , 2002 .

[16]  Nikhil Bansal,et al.  Constructive Algorithms for Discrepancy Minimization , 2010, 2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[17]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Consensus halving is PPA-complete , 2017, STOC.

[18]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium , 2006, STOC '06.

[19]  Joel H. Spencer,et al.  On-Line Balancing of Random Inputs , 2020, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[20]  H PapadimitriouChristos,et al.  The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium , 2009 .

[21]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  The complexity of splitting necklaces and bisecting ham sandwiches , 2018, STOC.

[22]  Noga Alon,et al.  Algorithmic construction of sets for k-restrictions , 2006, TALG.

[23]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Hardness Results for Consensus-Halving , 2016, MFCS.

[24]  Amin Saberi,et al.  The complexity of equilibria: Hardness results for economies via a correspondence with games , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..