Improving Unmanned Aerial Vehicle–Based Acoustic Atmospheric Tomography by Varying the Engine Firing Rate of the Aircraft

AbstractIf the acoustic signature of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is observed as it overflies an array of ground microphones, then the projected and observed Doppler shifts in frequency of the narrowband tones generated by its engine may be compared and converted into effective sound speed values. This allows 2D and 3D spatially varying atmospheric temperature and wind velocity fields to be estimated using tomography. Errors in estimating sound speed values are inversely proportional to the rate of change in the narrowband tones received on the ground. As this rate of change typically approaches zero at least twice per microphone during the UAV’s overflight, errors in the time of flight estimates are typically too large to deliver useful precision to the tomographically derived temperature and wind fields. However, these errors may be reduced by one or two orders of magnitude by continuously varying the engine throttle rate, thereby making the tomographic technique potentially feasible. This is demons...

[1]  J. Spiesberger,et al.  Passive Localization of Calling Animals and Sensing of their Acoustic Environment Using Acoustic Tomography , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Sergey N Vecherin,et al.  Source localization from an elevated acoustic sensor array in a refractive atmosphere. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M. Vetterli,et al.  Acoustic tomography for scalar and vector fields: theory and application to temperature and wind estimation , 2009 .

[5]  B.G. Ferguson,et al.  Tactical unmanned aerial vehicle localization using ground-based acoustic sensors , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, 2004..

[6]  Brian G. Ferguson,et al.  Application of the short‐time Fourier transform and the Wigner–Ville distribution to the acoustic localization of aircraft , 1994 .

[7]  Manuela Barth,et al.  Acoustic tomographic imaging of temperature and flow fields in air , 2011 .

[8]  R. Moses,et al.  Acoustic time delay estimation and sensor network self-localization: Experimental results , 2005 .

[9]  Sebastian Ehrlichmann Acoustics In Moving Inhomogeneous Media , 2016 .

[10]  Dennis W. Thomson,et al.  Acoustic Tomographic Monitoring of the Atmospheric Surface Layer , 1994 .

[11]  Sergey N. Vecherin,et al.  Recent progress in acoustic tomography of the atmosphere , 2008 .

[13]  Armin Raabe,et al.  Acoustic Travel Time Tomography – A Method for Remote Sensingof the Atmospheric Surface Layer , 1999 .

[14]  A. Ziemann,et al.  Acoustic tomography inside the atmospheric boundary layer , 1999 .

[15]  B G Ferguson,et al.  Turboprop and rotary-wing aircraft flight parameter estimation using both narrow-band and broadband passive acoustic signal-processing methods. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Ivana Jovanovic Inverse Problems in Acoustic Tomography: Theory and Applications , 2008 .

[17]  D. Wilson,et al.  Time-dependent stochastic inversion in acoustic tomography of the atmosphere with reciprocal sound transmission , 2008 .

[18]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .

[19]  Kevin Rogers,et al.  Acoustic atmospheric tomography using multiple unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014, Remote Sensing.

[20]  Sergey N. Vecherin,et al.  Time-dependent stochastic inversion in acoustic travel-time tomography of the atmosphere , 2006 .

[21]  E. Patton,et al.  The Effect of Mesh Resolution on Convective Boundary Layer Statistics and Structures Generated by Large-Eddy Simulation , 2011 .

[22]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[23]  R. Snieder Inverse Problems in Geophysics , 2001 .

[24]  Anthony Finn,et al.  UAV-Based Atmospheric Tomography , 2011 .

[25]  N. Hassani,et al.  Principles of computerized tomography. , 1976, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[26]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Global positioning system : theory and applications , 1996 .

[27]  Sergey N Vecherin,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction of atmospheric turbulence with the use of time-dependent stochastic inversion. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  K. Rogers,et al.  The feasibility of unmanned aerial vehicle-based acoustic atmospheric tomography. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  M. Glas,et al.  Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , 2000 .

[30]  Per Enge,et al.  Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Volume II , 1996 .

[31]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Algorithms for Localization and Tracking of Acoustic Sources with Widely Separated Sensors , 2000 .

[32]  Kevin Rogers,et al.  3D acoustic atmospheric tomography , 2014, Remote Sensing.

[33]  Anthony Finn,et al.  Three-Dimensional UAV-Based Atmospheric Tomography , 2013 .

[34]  Mahmood R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Acoustic Tomography of the Atmosphere Using Unscented Kalman Filter , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Armin Raabe,et al.  Acoustic Tomography as a Remote Sensing Method to Investigate the Near-Surface Atmospheric Boundary Layer in Comparison with In Situ Measurements , 2002 .

[36]  Anthony Finn,et al.  Acoustic sense & avoid for UAV's , 2011, 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.

[37]  Anthony Finn,et al.  Frequency estimation for 3D atmospheric tomography using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2013, 2013 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.