In this study, dynamic characteristics of a laboratory bridge model are determined by operational modal analysis using frequency and time domain methods. For this purpose, a reinforced box girder concrete bridge model is constructed in laboratory conditions. The bridge deck consists of a main span of 3 m and two side span of 1.5 m each. The structural system of the model bridge consists of deck, piers and foundation. The total length of bridge deck is 6 m and width of bridge deck is 60 cm. Ambient vibration tests are conducted to the model bridge to identify its natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios. Natural excitations such as wind and impact hammer are used to vibrate the model bridge. Vibration data is gathered from bridge deck. Measurement time, frequency span and effective mode number are determined by consider similar studies in literature. Sensitivity accelerometers are placed to collect signals from the measurements. The signals collected from the tests are processed by operational modal analysis; and the dynamic characteristics of the bridge model are estimated using enhanced frequency domain decomposition (EFDD) method in the frequency domain and stochastic subspace identification (SSI) method in the time domain. The dynamic characteristics obtained from both methods are found to be close to each other. Maximum 2.68% differences are obtained between natural frequencies for the first mode. Modal assurance criteria values are between 0.85-1.00. This shows that EFDD and SSI results are almost overlapped. It can be concluded that the both of enhanced frequency domain decomposition and stochastic subspace identification methods are very useful to identify the dynamic characteristics of the bridge model.
[1]
Palle Andersen,et al.
Modal Identification from Ambient Responses using Frequency Domain Decomposition
,
2000
.
[2]
Bart Peeters,et al.
System identification and damage detection in civil engineering
,
2000
.
[3]
Marvin W. Halling,et al.
Full-scale reinforced concrete bridge bent condition assessment using forced vibration testing
,
2000,
Smart Structures.
[4]
J. Juang.
Applied system identification
,
1994
.
[5]
Masoud Sanayei,et al.
Finite Element Model Updating of Scale Bridge Model Using Measured Modal Response Data
,
2009
.
[6]
Rune Brincker,et al.
Why Output-Only Modal Testing is a Desirable Tool for a Wide Range of Practical Applications
,
2002
.
[7]
Palle Andersen,et al.
IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS – AN OVERVIEW AND PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES
,
2005
.
[8]
Rune Brincker,et al.
Using Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition as a Robust Technique to Harmonic Excitation in Operational Modal Analysis
,
2006
.
[9]
J. Bendat,et al.
Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures
,
1987
.
[10]
Bart De Moor,et al.
Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications
,
2011
.
[11]
D. J. Ewins,et al.
Modal Testing: Theory and Practice
,
1984
.
[12]
B. Peeters,et al.
Reference based stochastic subspace identification in civil engineering
,
1999
.
[13]
Carlos E. Ventura,et al.
Why Output Only Modal Analysis is a Desirable Tool for a Wide Range of Practical Applications
,
2003
.