Agreement in Histological Assessment of Mitotic Activity Between Microscopy and Digital Whole Slide Images Informs Conversion for Clinical Diagnosis

Validating digital pathology as substitute for conventional microscopy in diagnosis remains a priority to assure effectiveness. Intermodality concordance studies typically focus on achieving the same diagnosis by digital display of whole slide images and conventional microscopy. Assessment of discrete histological features in whole slide images, such as mitotic figures, has not been thoroughly evaluated in diagnostic practice. To further gauge the interchangeability of conventional microscopy with digital display for primary diagnosis, 12 pathologists examined 113 canine naturally occurring mucosal melanomas exhibiting a wide range of mitotic activity. Design reflected diverse diagnostic settings and investigated independent location, interpretation, and enumeration of mitotic figures. Intermodality agreement was assessed employing conventional microscopy (CM40×), and whole slide image specimens scanned at 20× (WSI20×) and at 40× (WSI40×) objective magnifications. An aggregate 1647 mitotic figure count observations were available from conventional microscopy and whole slide images for comparison. The intraobserver concordance rate of paired observations was 0.785 to 0.801; interobserver rate was 0.784 to 0.794. Correlation coefficients between the 2 digital modes, and as compared to conventional microscopy, were similar and suggest noninferiority among modalities, including whole slide image acquired at lower 20× resolution. As mitotic figure counts serve for prognostic grading of several tumor types, including melanoma, 6 of 8 pathologists retrospectively predicted survival prognosis using whole slide images, compared to 9 of 10 by conventional microscopy, a first evaluation of whole slide image for mitotic figure prognostic grading. This study demonstrated agreement of replicate reads obtained across conventional microscopy and whole slide images. Hence, quantifying mitotic figures served as surrogate histological feature with which to further credential the interchangeability of whole slide images for primary diagnosis.

[1]  Weijie Chen,et al.  Paired split-plot designs of multireader multicase studies , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[2]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  The Diagnostic Concordance of Whole Slide Imaging and Light Microscopy: A Systematic Review. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  Darren Treanor,et al.  Digital pathology for the primary diagnosis of breast histopathological specimens: an innovative validation and concordance study on digital pathology validation and training , 2018, Histopathology.

[4]  Yuting Zhang,et al.  Tumor mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma , 2003, Cancer.

[5]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Predictive Measures of Ordinal Association , 1971, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Arthur T. Johnson,et al.  Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring , 2012, Diagnostic Pathology.

[7]  R. Rocha,et al.  High agreement between whole slide imaging and optical microscopy for assessment of HER2 expression in breast cancer: whole slide imaging for the assessment of HER2 expression. , 2014, Pathology, research and practice.

[8]  Werner Kempf,et al.  Immunohistochemical dual staining as an adjunct in assessment of mitotic activity in melanoma , 2012, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[9]  T. Flotte,et al.  Comparison of a Medical-Grade Monitor vs Commercial Off-the-Shelf Display for Mitotic Figure Enumeration and Small Object (Helicobacter pylori) Detection , 2018, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  S. Elmore,et al.  Utilizing Whole Slide Images for Pathology Peer Review and Working Groups , 2015, Toxicologic pathology.

[11]  R. Matkowski,et al.  Mitotic rate is a more reliable unfavorable prognosticator than ulceration for early cutaneous melanoma: a 5-year survival analysis. , 2014, Oncology reports.

[12]  A. Sari,et al.  MIB-1 counting methods in meningiomas and agreement among pathologists. , 2008, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[13]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[14]  C. D. Savci-Heijink,et al.  Histopathology: ditch the slides, because digital and 3D are on show , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[15]  J. Fisher,et al.  A Measure of Confidence in Bland–Altman Analysis for the Interchangeability of Two Methods of Measurement , 2008, Journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[16]  Parvez M Lokhandwala,et al.  Mitotic Count by Phosphohistone H3 Immunohistochemical Staining Predicts Survival and Improves Interobserver Reproducibility in Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[17]  Patricia Switten Nielsen,et al.  Virtual microscopy: an evaluation of its validity and diagnostic performance in routine histologic diagnosis of skin tumors. , 2010, Human pathology.

[18]  R. Scolyer,et al.  Melanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  Michael Bonert,et al.  Mitotic counts in breast cancer should be standardized with a uniform sample area , 2017, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[20]  Kuang-Yu Jen,et al.  Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies. , 2013, Human pathology.

[21]  Savitri Krishnamurthy,et al.  Multi-institutional comparison of whole slide digital imaging and optical microscopy for interpretation of hematoxylin-eosin-stained breast tissue sections. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[22]  Stephen M. Hewitt,et al.  Automated Computational Detection, Quantitation, and Mapping of Mitosis in Whole-Slide Images for Clinically Actionable Surgical Pathology Decision Support , 2019, Journal of pathology informatics.

[23]  Shaimaa Al-Janabi,et al.  Evaluation of Mitotic Activity Index in Breast Cancer Using Whole Slide Digital Images , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  W Scott Campbell,et al.  Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology. , 2012, Human pathology.

[25]  J. Coindre Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  Clive R. Taylor,et al.  Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology , 2017, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[27]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  M. Kiupel,et al.  Prognostic Markers for Canine Melanocytic Neoplasms , 2011, Veterinary pathology.

[29]  Jaime Rodriguez-Canales,et al.  Sporadic naturally occurring melanoma in dogs as a preclinical model for human melanoma , 2013, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[30]  Charmaine D. Wilson,et al.  Mitotic Index is an Independent Predictor of Recurrence‐Free Survival in Meningioma , 2015, Brain pathology.

[31]  Victor E Reuter,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies. , 2011, Human pathology.

[32]  Shaimaa Al-Janabi,et al.  Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study. , 2012, Human pathology.

[33]  Marios A. Gavrielides,et al.  Observer Performance in the Use of Digital and Optical Microscopy for the Interpretation of Tissue-Based Biomarkers , 2014, Analytical cellular pathology.

[34]  Louis D. Silverstein,et al.  Observer Performance Using Virtual Pathology Slides: Impact of LCD Color Reproduction Accuracy , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[35]  Corinne Gurtner,et al.  Validation of Digital Microscopy Compared With Light Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Canine Cutaneous Tumors , 2018, Veterinary pathology.

[36]  C. Sima,et al.  Classification of thymic epithelial neoplasms is still a challenge to thoracic pathologists: a reproducibility study using digital microscopy. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[37]  F. Galibert,et al.  Naturally occurring melanomas in dogs as models for non‐UV pathways of human melanomas , 2014, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[38]  Hibret A Adissu,et al.  Naturally Occurring Canine Melanoma as a Predictive Comparative Oncology Model for Human Mucosal and Other Triple Wild-Type Melanomas , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.