The Medium is the Message: Composing Instruments and Performing Mappings

Many performers of novel musical instruments find it diffi- cult to engage audiences beyond those in the field. Previous research points to a failure to balance complexity with usability, and a loss of transparency due to the detachment of the controller and sound generator. The issue is often exacerbated by an audience�s lack of prior exposure to the instrument and its workings. However, we argue that there is a conflict underlying many novel musical instruments in that they are intended to be both a tool for creative expression and a creative work of art in themselves, resulting in incompatible requirements. By considering the instrument, the composition and the performance together as a whole with careful consideration of the rate of learning demanded of the audience, we propose that a lack of transparency can become an asset rather than a hindrance. Our approach calls for not only controller and sound generator to be designed in sympathy with each other, but composition, performance and physical form too. Identifying three design principles, we illustrate this approach with the Serendiptichord, a wearable instrument for dancers created by the authors.

[1]  Michael Gurevich,et al.  Style and Constraint in Electronic Musical Instruments , 2010, NIME.

[2]  Sarah Louise Nicolls,et al.  Interacting with the piano , 2010 .

[3]  Thor Magnusson,et al.  Designing Constraints: Composing and Performing with Digital Musical Systems , 2010, Computer Music Journal.

[4]  P. D. Stokes Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough , 2005 .

[5]  Matthew Wright,et al.  Problems and Prospects for Intimate Musical Control of Computers , 2002, Computer Music Journal.

[6]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  Principles for Designing Computer Music Controllers , 2001, NIME.

[7]  S. Jordà Instruments and Players: Some Thoughts on Digital Lutherie , 2004 .

[8]  Mark D. Plumbley,et al.  Information dynamics: patterns of expectation and surprise in the perception of music , 2009, Connect. Sci..

[9]  Sidney Fels,et al.  Mapping transparency through metaphor: towards more expressive musical instruments , 2002, Organised Sound.

[10]  E. Narmour The Analysis and Cognition of Melodic Complexity: The Implication-Realization Model , 1992 .

[11]  Sarah Nicolls,et al.  Seeking Out the Spaces Between: Using Improvisation in Collaborative Composition with Interactive Technology , 2010, Leonardo Music Journal.

[12]  John L. Sherry Flow and Media Enjoyment , 2004 .

[13]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  Designing for intimacy: creating new interfaces for musical expression , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  C. Stevens,et al.  Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation, by David Huron . Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006 , 2007 .

[15]  Alexander Refsum Jensenius,et al.  Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression , 2011 .

[16]  Joel Chadabe,et al.  Interactive Composing: An Overview , 1984, ICMC.

[17]  Paul Stapleton,et al.  Designing for Style in New Musical Interactions , 2009, NIME.

[18]  Tod Machover Instruments, Interactivity, and Inevitability , 2002, NIME.

[19]  Mark D. Plumbley,et al.  The Serendiptichord: A Wearable Instrument for Contemporary Dance Performance , 2010 .