Generalized process structure grammars GPSG for flexible representations of work

The promise of workflow solutions for coordinating organizational processes is currently being obscured by strong criticism of the rigidity of their work representations. This rigidity arises in part from viewing work processes as unfolding along a single line of temporally chained activities. In reality, work evolves both horizontally, in the cooperation of causally unrelated, but information-sharing tasks, and vertically, in the coordination of causally-dependent activities. In this paper, we present our process modeling approach which (1) views documents and tasks as duals of each other, capturing horizontal cooperation; and (2) exploits constraints to express the soft dependencies among related activities and documents within the framework of generative rulebased grammars for processes, thus handling vertical

[1]  Sunil K. Sarin,et al.  Experiences with workflow management: issues for the next generation , 1994, CSCW '94.

[2]  Patricia Sachs,et al.  Transforming work: collaboration, learning, and design , 1995, CACM.

[3]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Supporting Cooperative Awareness with Local Event Mechanisms: The GroupDesk System , 1995, ECSCW.

[4]  Keith D. Swenson,et al.  A Business Process Environment Supporting Collaborative Planning , 1994 .

[5]  Grzegorz Rozenberg,et al.  Dynamic change within workflow systems , 1995, COCS '95.

[6]  Jean-Marc Andreoli,et al.  The Coordination Language Facility: Coordination of Distributed Objects , 1996, Theory Pract. Object Syst..

[7]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[8]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[9]  Gert Florijn,et al.  ARIADNE and HOPLa: Flexible Coordination of Collaborative Processes , 1996, COORDINATION.

[10]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The politics of design: representing work , 1995, CACM.

[11]  John Bowers,et al.  Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor , 1995, ECSCW.

[12]  Gert Smolka,et al.  A Feature Constraint System for Logic Programming with Entailment , 1994, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[13]  John Bowers,et al.  Local and global structuring of computer mediated communication: developing linguistic perspectives on CSCW in cosmos , 1988, CSCW '88.

[14]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[15]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Design for Unanticipated Use , 1993, ECSCW.

[16]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies@m_Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[17]  Michael D. Zisman,et al.  Representation, specification and automation of office procedures , 1977 .

[18]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Modeling and Enactment of Workflow Systems , 1993, Application and Theory of Petri Nets.

[19]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes , 1995 .

[20]  Gert Smolka,et al.  A Feature-Based Constraint System for Logic Programming with Entailment , 1992, FGCS.

[21]  Ronald M. Baecker,et al.  How People Write Together , 1992 .