The direct and indirect roles of fundamental frequency in vowel perception.

Several experiments have found that changing the intrinsic f0 of a vowel can have an effect on perceived vowel quality. It has been suggested that these shifts may occur because f0 is involved in the specification of vowel quality in the same way as the formant frequencies. Another possibility is that f0 affects vowel quality indirectly, by changing a listener's assumptions about characteristics of a speaker who is likely to have uttered the vowel. In the experiment outlined here, participants were asked to listen to vowels differing in terms of f0 and their formant frequencies and report vowel quality and the apparent speaker's gender and size on a trial-by-trial basis. The results presented here suggest that f0 affects vowel quality mainly indirectly via its effects on the apparent-speaker characteristics; however, f0 may also have some residual direct effects on vowel quality. Furthermore, the formant frequencies were also found to have significant indirect effects on vowel quality by way of their strong influence on the apparent speaker.

[1]  R. Miller Auditory Tests with Synthetic Vowels , 1951 .

[2]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[3]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[4]  G. Fant Acoustic theory of speech production : with calculations based on X-ray studies of Russian articulations , 1961 .

[5]  A. Slawson Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H. Fujisaki,et al.  The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels , 1968 .

[7]  I Lehiste,et al.  Vowel and speaker identification in natural and synthetic speech. , 1973, Language and speech.

[8]  N J Lass,et al.  Correlational study of speakers' heights, weights, body surface areas, and speaking fundamental frequencies. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Norman J. Lass,et al.  The Effect of Filtered Speech on Speaker Height and Weight Identification. , 1980 .

[10]  T L Gottfried,et al.  Intelligibility of vowels sung by a countertenor. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  T. M. Nearey Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. J. Price,et al.  Male and female voice source characteristics: Inverse filtering results , 1989, Speech Commun..

[15]  H J Künzel,et al.  How Well Does Average Fundamental Frequency Correlate with Speaker Height and Weight? , 1989, Phonetica.

[16]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Context Effects in a Double-Weak Theory of Speech Perception , 1992, Language and speech.

[20]  Wim A. van Dommelen,et al.  Speaker height and weight identification: a re-evaluation of some old data , 1993 .

[21]  H. Hollien,et al.  Longitudinal research on adolescent voice change in males. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  H. Traunmüller Conventional, Biological and Environmental Factors in Speech Communication: A Modulation Theory , 1994, Phonetica.

[23]  W. V. van Dommelen,et al.  Acoustic Parameters in Speaker Height and Weight Identification: Sex-Specific Behaviour , 1995, Language and speech.

[24]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  E. Mendoza,et al.  Differences in voice quality between men and women: use of the long-term average spectrum (LTAS). , 1996, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[26]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Acoustic correlates of talker sex and individual talker identity are present in a short vowel segment produced in running speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Elizabeth A. Strand,et al.  Auditory–visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception , 1999 .

[28]  W. Fitch,et al.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  S. Collins,et al.  Men's voices and women's choices , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Elizabeth A. Strand Gender stereotype effects in speech processing , 2000 .

[31]  D. Ashmead,et al.  The acoustic bases for gender identification from children's voices. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Segregating information about the size and shape of the vocal tract using a time-domain auditory model: The stabilised wavelet-Mellin transform , 2002, Speech Commun..

[33]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  A narrow band pattern-matching model of vowel perception. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[35]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[36]  Peter F. Assmann,et al.  Effects of visual gender and frequency shifts on vowel category judgments , 2004 .

[37]  Julio González,et al.  Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: a weak relationship in adult humans , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[38]  Roy D Patterson,et al.  The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Richard E. Turner,et al.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Effects of frequency shifts on perceived naturalness and gender information in speech , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[41]  Drew Rendall,et al.  Lifting the curtain on the Wizard of Oz: biased voice-based impressions of speaker size. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Peter F Assmann,et al.  Relationship between fundamental and formant frequencies in voice preference. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception , 2008, The Handbook of Speech Perception.

[44]  Peter F Assmann,et al.  Identification of frequency-shifted vowels. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  M. D. De Bodt,et al.  Breathiness as a feminine voice characteristic: a perceptual approach. , 2009, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.