Overlapping faults and their effect on fluid flow in different reservoir types: A LIDAR-based outcrop modeling and flow simulation study

In this article we focus on the potential of fault-overlap zones as conduits for fluid flow in a variety of reservoir types. Light detection and ranging (LIDAR) technology were applied to collect a three-dimensional, spatially constrained data set from a well-exposed fault-overlap zone that crops out in the Devil's Lane area of the Canyonlands National Park in Utah. A virtual outcrop was generated and used to extract structural and stratigraphic data that were taken into a reservoir modeling software and reconstructed. The outcrop-based model was flow simulated and used to test fluid flow through a real-world fault-overlap zone. A structural framework was built based on collected outcrop data and combined with a series of nine different facies models. The different facies models included an eolian model based on the outcrop and a range of synthetic fluvial and shallow marine systems. Results show that, for certain depositional models, cross-fault reservoir communication may be poor despite the geometric connectivity of the relay beds. This was the case for low net/gross fluvial models and shoreface models. Conversely, high net/gross fluvial systems and eolian systems show good communication through the same relay zone. Overall, the results show that, in the presence of a fault-overlap zone, pressure communication across a relay ramp may still be poor depending on the scale of the faults and relay ramp as well as the geometry and volume of the sands.

[1]  S. Buckley,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[2]  R. Tenghamn PGS shows off electrical marine vibrator to capture ‘alternative’ seismic source market , 2006 .

[3]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  Faults, fluid flow, and petroleum traps , 2005 .

[4]  C. Mansfield,et al.  The growth of normal faults by segment linkage , 1996, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[5]  J. Howell,et al.  Modelling of dipping clinoform barriers within deltaic outcrop analogues from the Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, USA , 2008 .

[6]  Ragnar Hauge,et al.  Modeling of Fluvial Reservoirs with Object Models , 1998 .

[7]  Maurice E. Tucker,et al.  Oz's first Great Barrier Reef , 2005 .

[8]  I. Trinks,et al.  Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork , 2005, Journal of the Geological Society.

[9]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Virtual outcrop models of petroleum reservoir analogues: a review of the current state-of-the-art , 2006 .

[10]  G. Davis Structural Geology of the Colorado Plateau Region of Southern Utah, With Special Emphasis on Deformation Bands , 1999 .

[11]  Amir Sagy,et al.  Evolution of fault-surface roughness with slip , 2007 .

[12]  Robert J. Knipe,et al.  The permeability of faults within siliciclastic petroleum reservoirs of the North Sea and Norwegian Continental Shelf , 2001 .

[13]  J. Howell,et al.  Are relay ramps conduits for fluid flow? Structural analysis of a relay ramp in Arches National Park, Utah , 2007, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[14]  D. Schultz-Ela,et al.  Modeling of Grabens Extending above Evaporites in Canyonlands National Park, Utah , 2002 .

[15]  J. Cartwright,et al.  Relay-ramp forms and normal-fault linkages, Canyonlands National Park, Utah , 1994 .

[16]  Alister C. MacDonald,et al.  A Prototype Procedure for Stochastic Modeling of Facies Tract Distribution in Shoreface Reservoirs , 1994 .

[17]  Robert J. Knipe,et al.  Juxtaposition and Seal Diagrams to Help Analyze Fault Seals in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs , 1997 .

[18]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Topics: Virtual geological outcrops – fieldwork and analysis made less exhaustive? , 2004 .

[19]  H. Fossen,et al.  Seismic attribute analysis in structural interpretation of the Gullfaks Field, northern North Sea , 1997, Petroleum Geoscience.

[20]  N. Mountney,et al.  Stratigraphic evolution of an aeolian erg margin system: the Permian Cedar Mesa Sandstone, SE Utah, USA , 2004 .

[21]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Displacements, segment linkage and relay ramps in normal fault zones , 1991 .

[22]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[23]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  3D high-resolution digital models of outcrop analogue study sites to constrain reservoir model uncertainty: an example from Alport Castles, Derbyshire, UK , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[24]  T. Manzocchi,et al.  Sensitivity of Oil Production to Petrophysical Heterogeneities , 2005 .

[25]  J. A. Howell,et al.  Three-dimensional geological models from outcrop data using digital data collection techniques: an example from the Tanqua Karoo depocentre, South Africa , 2005, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[26]  S. Flint,et al.  The Geological modelling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and outcrop analogues , 1992 .

[27]  Marc Levoy,et al.  The digital Michelangelo project: 3D scanning of large statues , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[28]  J. Walsh,et al.  Fault overlap zones within developing normal fault systems , 1995, Journal of the Geological Society.

[29]  G. Grammer,et al.  Integration of Outcrop and Modern Analogs in Reservoir Modeling , 2004 .

[30]  John A. Howell,et al.  From outcrop to reservoir simulation model: Workflow and procedures , 2007 .

[31]  S. Flint,et al.  Sequence, parasequence, and intraparasequence architecture of the Grassy Member, Blackhawk Formation, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA , 1995 .

[32]  Joe Cartwright,et al.  Fault growth by linkage: observations and implications from analogue models , 2001 .

[33]  Richard A. Schultz,et al.  Processes of Faulting in Jointed Rocks of Canyonlands National Park, Utah , 1999 .

[34]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Geometry and Development of Relay Ramps in Normal Fault Systems , 1994 .

[35]  A. Reynolds Dimensions of Paralic Sandstone Bodies , 1999 .