Interaction patterns of brain activity across space, time and frequency. Part I: methods

We consider exploratory methods for the discovery of cortical functional connectivity. Typically, data for the i-th subject (i=1...NS) is represented as an NVxNT matrix Xi, corresponding to brain activity sampled at NT moments in time from NV cortical voxels. A widely used method of analysis first concatenates all subjects along the temporal dimension, and then performs an independent component analysis (ICA) for estimating the common cortical patterns of functional connectivity. There exist many other interesting variations of this technique, as reviewed in [Calhoun et al. 2009 Neuroimage 45: S163-172]. We present methods for the more general problem of discovering functional connectivity occurring at all possible time lags. For this purpose, brain activity is viewed as a function of space and time, which allows the use of the relatively new techniques of functional data analysis [Ramsay & Silverman 2005: Functional data analysis. New York: Springer]. In essence, our method first vectorizes the data from each subject, which constitutes the natural discrete representation of a function of several variables, followed by concatenation of all subjects. The singular value decomposition (SVD), as well as the ICA of this new matrix of dimension [rows=(NT*NV); columns=NS] will reveal spatio-temporal patterns of connectivity. As a further example, in the case of EEG neuroimaging, Xi of size NVxNW may represent spectral density for electric neuronal activity at NW discrete frequencies from NV cortical voxels, from the i-th EEG epoch. In this case our functional data analysis approach would reveal coupling of brain regions at possibly different frequencies.

[1]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[2]  D. Yarnitsky,et al.  Neurophysiology of the cortical pain network: revisiting the role of S1 in subjective pain perception via standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). , 2008, Journal of Pain.

[3]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing - Learning Algorithms and Applications , 2002 .

[6]  Ying Guo,et al.  A unified framework for group independent component analysis for multi-subject fMRI data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  E. Ziegel Matrix Differential Calculus With Applications in Statistics and Econometrics , 1989 .

[8]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  A group model for stable multi-subject ICA on fMRI datasets , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[10]  Dynamic interactions in terms of senders, hubs, and receivers (SHR) using the singular value decomposition of time series: Theory and brain connectivity applications , 2010, 1009.0796.

[11]  S. Debener,et al.  Mining EEG-fMRI using independent component analysis. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[12]  N. Thakor,et al.  Quantitative EEG analysis methods and clinical applications , 2009 .

[13]  Kaiming Li,et al.  Review of methods for functional brain connectivity detection using fMRI , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[14]  J. Magnus,et al.  Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics , 1991 .

[15]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.