An error limit for the evolution of language

On the evolutionary trajectory that led to human language there must have been a transition from a fairly limited to an essentially unlimited communication system. The structure of modern human languages reveals at least two steps that are required for such a transition: in all languages (i) a small number of phonemes are used to generate a large number of words; and (ii) a large number of words are used to a produce an unlimited number of sentences. The first (and simpler) step is the topic of the current paper. We study the evolution of communication in the presence of errorsand show that this limits the number of objects (or concepts) that can be described by a simple communication system. The evolutionary optimum is achieved by using only a small number of signals to describe a few valuable concepts. Adding more signals does not increase the fitness of a language. This represents an error–limit for the evolution of communication. We show that this error limit can be overcome by combining signals (phonemes) into words. The transition from an analog to a digital system was a necessary step toward theevolution of human language.

[1]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[2]  Owen Gingerich.  Uniquely human , 1992, Nature.

[3]  J. Metz,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics: A Geometrical Study of the Consequences of Nearly Faithful Reproduction , 1995 .

[4]  M A Nowak,et al.  The evolution of language. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and Representations , 1982 .

[6]  S. Pinker.  The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[7]  M. Nowak,et al.  The continuous Prisoner's dilemma: II. Linear reactive strategies with noise. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  J. Nash,et al.  Essays on Game Theory , 1997 .

[9]  M A Nowak,et al.  Language evolution and information theory. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky.  Reflections on Language. , 1977 .

[12]  Clive K. Catchpole,et al.  The Behaviour of Communicating , 1978 .

[13]  P. C. Lee.  How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species , 1990 .

[14]  D. E. Matthews.  Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[15]  P. Marler.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? , 1970, American scientist.

[16]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  How Monkeys See the World , 1990 .

[17]  K. Frisch.  The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .

[18]  Dominic J. A. Welsh,et al.  Codes and cryptography , 1988 .

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  The evolutionary language game. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Coding and Information Theory , 1980 .

[21]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  R. N. Indah.  Language and Speech , 1958, Nature.