Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the attainability of tight risk factor control targets for three diabetes risk factors and to assess the degree of polypharmacy required. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III. STUDY DESIGN We simulated a strategy of "treating to targets," exposing subjects to a battery of treatments until low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (100 mg/dL), hemoglobin A1c (7 percent), and blood pressure (130/80 mm Hg) targets were achieved or until all treatments had been exhausted. Regimens included five statins of increasing potency, four A1c-lowering therapies, and eight steps of antihypertensive therapy. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We selected parameter estimates from placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Under ideal efficacy conditions, 77, 64, and 58 percent of subjects achieved the LDL, A1c, and blood pressure targets, respectively. Successful control depended highly on a subject's baseline number of treatments. Using the least favorable assumptions of treatment tolerance, success rates were 11-17 percentage points lower. Approximately 57 percent of subjects required five or more medication classes. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of people with diabetes will fail to achieve targets despite using high doses of multiple, conventional treatments. These findings raise concerns about the feasibility and polypharmacy burden needed for tight risk factor control, and the use of measures of tight control to assess the quality of care for diabetes.

[1]  F. McAlister,et al.  Antihypertensive medication prescribing in 27,822 elderly Canadians with diabetes over the past decade. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[2]  L. Nalysnyk,et al.  Discontinuation of Antihypertensive Drugs Due to Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis , 2001, Pharmacotherapy.

[3]  Ames,et al.  Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Holman,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. , 1998 .

[5]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Improving the Reliability of Physician Performance Assessment: Identifying the “Physician Effect” on Quality and Creating Composite Measures , 2009, Medical care.

[6]  S. Ellenberg Surrogate end points in clinical trials. , 1991, BMJ.

[7]  J. Dora,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008 , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[8]  D J Reda,et al.  Single-Drug Therapy for Hypertension in Men -- A Comparison of Six Antihypertensive Agents with Placebo , 1993 .

[9]  Luni Chen,et al.  Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  W. Alexander,et al.  Contraindications to the use of metformin , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  C. Lewis,et al.  A summary of the effects of antihypertensive medications on measured blood pressure. , 2005, American journal of hypertension.

[12]  T. Wilt,et al.  Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  T. Lumley,et al.  Time trends in high blood pressure control and the use of antihypertensive medications in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[15]  J. Henney Infant Pneumococcal Vaccine , 2000 .

[16]  N J Wald,et al.  Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  S. Nightingale,et al.  From the Food and Drug administration. , 1990, JAMA.

[18]  Jeffrey B. Gross,et al.  Timing of New Black Box Warnings and Withdrawals for Prescription Medications , 2003 .

[19]  N J Wald,et al.  Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Diederick Grobbee,et al.  Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Minge Xie,et al.  Assessing quality of diabetes care by measuring longitudinal changes in hemoglobin A1c in the Veterans Health Administration. , 2005, Health services research.

[22]  D. DeMets,et al.  Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  Joël Ménard,et al.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial , 1998, The Lancet.

[24]  M. Safford,et al.  Performance status of health care facilities changes with risk adjustment of HbA1c. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[25]  O. Faergeman,et al.  High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[26]  R. Arora,et al.  The role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular disease--a pooled meta-analysis of long-term randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. , 2007, American heart journal.

[27]  D. Asch,et al.  Racial Profiling: The Unintended Consequences of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Report Cards , 2005, Circulation.

[28]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Analysis of Complex Survey Samples , 2004 .

[29]  R. Hayward,et al.  Beyond the Randomized Clinical Trial the Role of Effectiveness Studies in Evaluating Cardiovascular Therapies the Achilles' Heel of Rcts Key Issues in Outcomes Research , 2022 .

[30]  S. Nissen,et al.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Redefining quality--implications of recent clinical trials. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Rodney A Hayward,et al.  Narrative Review: Lack of Evidence for Recommended Low-Density Lipoprotein Treatment Targets: A Solvable Problem , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  F. Nuttall,et al.  Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in Type II Diabetes (VA CSDM): Results of the feasibility trial , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[34]  R. Hayward,et al.  Avoiding pitfalls in chronic disease quality measurement: a case for the next generation of technical quality measures. , 2001, The American journal of managed care.

[35]  Neil J Stone,et al.  Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines , 2004, Circulation.

[36]  Rodney A Hayward,et al.  Building a Better Quality Measure: Are Some Patients With ‘Poor Quality’ Actually Getting Good Care? , 2003, Medical care.