Spatial and temporal variations in land development and impervious surface creation in Oakland County, Michigan, 1945–2005

Summary Impervious surface has been recognized as a key indicator of watershed health and function. The rapid expansion of impervious surface associated with periurban development following the Second World War resulted in concerns that impervious surface would alter flow characteristics, water quality, sediment, and stream morphology. These effects have been documented in studies across many disciplines. Unfortunately, impervious surface is difficult to measure directly, and other forms of land-use data are often substituted as surrogates. This paper highlights the shortcomings in land-use data, particularly parcel-based land-use data, as a surrogate for impervious surface in a periurban environment. Periurban development has changed substantially in the last several decades. This study investigates changes in the form of periurban development in Oakland County, Michigan, from 1945 to 2005, with an emphasis on the accumulation of impervious surface. We first evaluate patterns in the sizes of parcels being developed to residential uses. Using an impervious surface map derived from aerial imagery, we then calculate amount of impervious surface created by different forms of development, both in parcels of similar sizes developed at different times, and across parcel sizes for the period of the study. The results indicate substantial variability in impervious surface within periurban residential development, from 5.4% of parcel area to 25.4% of total parcel area depending on parcel size. Even within relatively specific categories (for example, residential parcels less than 743 square metre) impervious surface varied between 18.5% and 34.6% of the parcel area between 1945 and 2000. Since 1980, the trend has been toward larger parcel sizes with lower impervious surface ratios. The overall effect is that land is being developed at a rate substantially greater than the rate impervious surface is being created. The bias created by the trend to larger parcel sizes with smaller impervious surface ratios results in a tendency to overestimate the effects of recent land development. In combination with the change in character of suburban development, this bias has a tendency to overestimate the hydrologic response to new development. This overestimation is easily overlooked because it is consistent with the expected effect of urbanization. However, this effect helps explain observed field results indicating little change in streamflow through time despite significant apparent periurban development.

[1]  T. Chang,et al.  Inundation simulation for urban drainage basin with storm sewer system , 2000 .

[2]  Randel L. Dymond,et al.  Evaluation of Impervious Surface Estimates in a Rapidly Urbanizing Watershed , 2004, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.

[3]  W. Marsh,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA , 1995 .

[4]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[5]  J. Genderen,et al.  TESTING LAND-USE MAP ACCURACY , 1977 .

[6]  W. O. Thomas,et al.  Flood Characteristics of Urban Watersheds in the United States , 1983 .

[7]  Craig A. Stow,et al.  PATTERNS OF WATERSHED URBANIZATION AND IMPACTS ON WATER QUALITY 1 , 2005 .

[8]  William M. Alley,et al.  Effective Impervious Area in Urban Runoff Modeling , 1983 .

[9]  W. Powell Identifying Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) Using National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Data as a Hydrologic Model Input for Local Flood Plain Management , 2009 .

[10]  W. Shuster,et al.  Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review , 2005 .

[11]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[12]  Luna B. Leopold,et al.  Hydrology for urban land plan-ning-a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use , 1968 .

[13]  W. Acevedo,et al.  Rates, trends, causes, and consequences of urban land-use change in the United States , 2006 .

[14]  L. A. Martens Flood inundation and effects of urbanization in Metropolitan Charlotte North Carolina , 1968 .

[15]  V. Smakhtin Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[16]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[17]  Martin M. Kaufman,et al.  Hydro-ecological implications of edge cities , 1997 .

[18]  G. McMahon Consequences of Land-cover Misclassification in Models of Impervious Surface , 2007 .

[19]  E. Harris,et al.  Effect of urban growth on streamflow regimen of Permanente Creek, Santa Clara County, California , 1964 .

[20]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  James M. Keller,et al.  Automated Geospatial Conflation of Vector Road Maps to High Resolution Imagery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Robert M. Hirsch,et al.  The influence of man on hydrologic systems , 1990 .

[23]  Mark Hood,et al.  Comparison of Stormwater Lag Times for Low Impact and Traditional Residential Development 1 , 2007 .

[24]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Water In Environmental Planning , 1978 .

[25]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[26]  R. Klein URBANIZATION AND STREAM QUALITY IMPAIRMENT , 1979 .

[27]  H. P. Guy,et al.  Sediment movement in an area of suburban highway construction, Scott Run Basin, Fairfax County Virginia, 1961-64 , 1969 .

[28]  S. Aichele Effects of urban land-use change on streamflow and water quality in Oakland County, Michigan, 1970-2003, as inferred from urban gradient and temporal analysis , 2005 .