Comments on the size of the simulation box in cosmological N‐body simulations

N-body simulations are a very important tool in the study of the formation of large-scale structures. Much of the progress in understanding the physics of the high-redshift universe and comparison with observations would not have been possible without N-body simulations. Given the importance of this tool, it is essential to understand its limitations, as ignoring the limitations can easily lead to interesting but unreliable results. In this paper we study the limitations arising out of the finite size of the simulation volume. This finite size implies that modes larger than the size of the simulation volume are ignored and a truncated power spectrum is simulated. If the simulation volume is large enough then the mass in collapsed haloes expected from the full power spectrum and from the truncated power spectrum should match. We propose a quantitative measure based on this approach that allows us to compute the minimum box size for an N-body simulation. We find that the required box size for simulations of the ACDM model at high redshifts is much larger than is typically used. We can also use this approach to quantify the effect of perturbations at large scales for power-law models and we find that if we fix the scale of non-linearity, the required box size becomes very large as the index becomes small. The appropriate box size computed using this approach is also an appropriate choice for the transition scale when tools like MAP, which add the contribution of the missing power, are used.

[1]  P. Peebles,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe , 2020 .

[2]  A. Loeb,et al.  Unusually Large Fluctuations in the Statistics of Galaxy Formation at High Redshift , 2003, astro-ph/0310338.

[3]  J. Bagla,et al.  Performance Characteristics of TreePM codes , 2002, astro-ph/0212129.

[4]  J. Peacock,et al.  Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra , 2002, astro-ph/0207664.

[5]  S. Colombi,et al.  Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory , 2001, astro-ph/0112551.

[6]  Ravi K. Sheth Giuseppe Tormen Large scale bias and the peak background split , 1999, astro-ph/9901122.

[7]  N. Kanekar A critique of scaling behaviour in non-linear structure formation scenarios , 1998, astro-ph/9812203.

[8]  Chung-Pei Ma Analytical Approximation to the Nonlinear Power Spectrum of Gravitational Clustering , 1998, astro-ph/9809267.

[9]  E. Bertschinger SIMULATIONS OF STRUCTURE FORMATION IN THE UNIVERSE , 1998 .

[10]  P. Peebles,et al.  A Numerical Renormalization Solution for Self-similar Cosmic Structure Formation , 1997, astro-ph/9708230.

[11]  T. Padmanabhan,et al.  Transfer of power in non-linear gravitational clustering , 1996, astro-ph/9605202.

[12]  S. Cole Adding long-wavelength power to N-body simulations , 1996, astro-ph/9604046.

[13]  J. Peacock,et al.  Non-linear evolution of cosmological power spectra , 1996, astro-ph/9603031.

[14]  T. Padmanabhan Modelling the non-linear gravitational clustering in the expanding Universe , 1996 .

[15]  E. Bertschinger,et al.  Adding Long-wavelength Modes to an N-body Simulation , 1995, astro-ph/9512131.

[16]  E. Bertschinger,et al.  Local Approximations to the Gravitational Collapse of Cold Matter , 1995, astro-ph/9508114.

[17]  R. Cen,et al.  Patterns in Nonlinear Gravitational Clustering: A Numerical Investigation , 1995, astro-ph/9506051.

[18]  P. Coles,et al.  Approximation methods for non-linear gravitational clustering , 1995, astro-ph/9505005.

[19]  S. White,et al.  The evolution of correlation functions and power spectra in gravitational clustering , 1995, astro-ph/9501047.

[20]  J. M. Gelb,et al.  Cold dark matter. 1: The Formation of dark halos , 1994, astro-ph/9408028.

[21]  J. M. Gelb,et al.  Cold dark matter. 2: Spatial and velocity statistics , 1994, astro-ph/9408029.

[22]  J. A. PeacockS.J. Dodds,et al.  Reconstructing the linear power spectrum of cosmological mass fluctuations , 1993, astro-ph/9311057.

[23]  T. Padmanabhan,et al.  Scaling properties of gravitational clustering in the nonlinear regime , 1993 .

[24]  J. Villumsen,et al.  Linear Evolution of the Gravitational Potential: A New Approximation for the Nonlinear Evolution of Large-Scale Structure , 1993 .

[25]  L. Moscardini,et al.  A frozen-flow approximation to the evolution of large-scale structures in the Universe , 1992 .

[26]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The void spectrum in two-dimensional numerical simulations of gravitational clustering , 1992 .

[27]  Changbom Park,et al.  Primordial fluctuations and non-linear structure , 1991 .

[28]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations , 1991 .

[29]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Reconstructing the primordial spectrum of fluctuations of the universe from the observed nonlinear clustering of galaxies , 1991 .

[30]  P. Peebles Renormalization group computation of the mass distribution in an expanding universe. I. Method , 1985 .

[31]  P. Peebles,et al.  On the integration of the BBGKY equations for the development of strongly nonlinear clustering in an expanding universe , 1977 .

[32]  William H. Press,et al.  Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation , 1974 .

[33]  Thanu Padmanabhan,et al.  Theoretical Astrophysics: Volume 3, Galaxies and Cosmology , 2000 .

[34]  T. Padmanabhan,et al.  Nonlinear evolution of density perturbations using approximate constancy of gravitational potential , 1994 .

[35]  A. I. Saichev,et al.  The large-scale structure of the Universe in the frame of the model equation of non-linear diffusion , 1989 .