A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Database is the largest voluntary clinical database in medicine. Using this database we examined changes in the risk profile of patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and their outcomes during the decade 1990 to 1999. METHODS Trends in 23 preoperative risk factors were tracked for CABG cases during this decade. Using a multivariate logistic risk model, we also determined the degree to which operative risk and risk-adjusted operative mortality changed during this 10-year interval. RESULTS Between 1990 and 1999, 1,154,486 patient records were harvested by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Database for isolated CABG procedures performed at 522 Society of Thoracic Surgeons participant sites in the United States and Canada. Over time, CABG patients were more likely to be older (mean age 63.7 in 1990, 65.1 in 1999), of female gender (25.7% women in 1990, 28.7% in 1999), and have a history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, hypertension, stroke, chronic lung disease, New York Heart Association functional class IV, and three-vessel disease (p < 0.0001). Patients' predicted operative risk increased by 30.1%, from 2.6% in 1990 to 3.4% in 1999. Despite higher risk, observed operative mortality decreased by 23.1%, from 3.9% in 1990 to 3.0% in 1999 (p < 0.0001). During the decade, a Medicare-aged subset (n = 629,174) experienced similar increases in risk and declines in mortality. CONCLUSIONS Patients referred for isolated CABG are significantly older, sicker, and have a higher risk than a decade ago. Despite this, CABG mortality rates have declined substantially. These results highlight the excellent progress in the care of CABG patients achieved during the past decade.

[1]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Survival at 15 to 18 Years After Coronary Bypass Surgery for Angina in Women , 1993, Circulation.

[2]  E L Hannan,et al.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. , 1994, JAMA.

[3]  E. DeLong,et al.  Challenges in comparing risk-adjusted bypass surgery mortality results: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A L Shroyer,et al.  The STS National Database: current changes and challenges for the new millennium. Committee to Establish a National Database in Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  A L Shroyer,et al.  The 1996 coronary artery bypass risk model: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac National Database. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  F. Harrell,et al.  Observational Comparison of Event‐Free Survival With Medical and Surgical Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 20 Years of Follow‐up , 1992, Circulation.

[7]  F. Loop,et al.  Increased risk and decreased morbidity of coronary artery bypass grafting between 1986 and 1994. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  Steven S. Khan,et al.  Interaction of Age and Preoperative Risk Factors in Predicting Operative Mortality for Coronary Bypass Surgery , 1992, Circulation.

[9]  F. Harrell,et al.  The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease. A 15-year perspective. , 1989, JAMA.

[10]  F. Loop,et al.  Primary myocardial revascularization. Trends in surgical mortality. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  J. Wennberg,et al.  A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1991, JAMA.

[12]  F H Edwards,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  L. Mickleborough,et al.  Results of revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  G. Beck,et al.  Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. , 1992, JAMA.

[15]  R. Bolman,et al.  Establishing and using a local/regional cardiac surgery database. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  G. Marshall,et al.  Time series monitors of outcomes. A new dimension for measuring quality of care. , 1998, Medical care.

[17]  R. E. Clark,et al.  Profile of preoperative characteristics of patients having CABG over the past decade. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  L. Mickleborough,et al.  Is sex a factor in determining operative risk for aortocoronary bypass graft surgery? , 1995, Circulation.

[19]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results of a statewide quality improvement initiative. , 2001, JAMA.

[20]  V Parsonnet,et al.  Clinical usefulness of risk-stratified outcome analysis in cardiac surgery in New Jersey. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  J. Gold,et al.  Survival Analysis of Octogenarian Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Managed by Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Conventional Medical Treatment , 1992, Circulation.

[22]  T. Ryan.  Present-day PTCR versus CABG: a randomized comparison with a different focus and a new result. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  R. Petersen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness and predictors of early extubation. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  A. Shroyer,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database: current risk assessment. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.