Accelerating innovation and commercialization through standardization of microfluidic-based medical devices.

Worldwide, the microfluidics industry has grown steadily over the last 5 years, with the market for microfluidic medical devices experiencing a compound growth rate of 22%. The number of submissions of microfluidic-based devices to regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has also steadily increased, creating a strong demand for the development of consistent and accessible tools for evaluating microfluidics-based devices. The microfluidics community has been slow, or even reluctant, to adopt standards and guidelines, which are needed for harmonization and for assisting academia, researchers, designers, and industry across all stages of product development. Appropriate assessments of device performance also remain a bottleneck for microfluidic devices. Standards reside at the core of mature supply chains generating economies of scale and forging a consistent pathway to match stakeholder expectations, thus creating a foundation for successful commercialization. This article provides a unique perspective on the need for the development of standards specific to the emerging biomedical field of microfluidics. Our aim is to facilitate innovation by encouraging the microfluidics community to work together to help bridge knowledge gaps and improve efficiency in getting high-quality microfluidic medical devices to market faster. We start by acknowledging the progress that has been made in various areas over the past decade. We then describe the existing gaps in the standardization of flow control, interconnections, component integration, manufacturing, assembly, packaging, reliability, performance of microfluidic elements and safety testing of microfluidic devices throughout the entire product life cycle.

[1]  A. Pfreundt,et al.  An easy-to-use microfluidic interconnection system to create quick and reversibly interfaced simple microfluidic devices , 2015 .

[2]  W. Schröder,et al.  Streamline segment scaling behavior in a turbulent wavy channel flow , 2017 .

[3]  Massimo Mastrangeli,et al.  Organ-on-chip in development: Towards a roadmap for organs-on-chip. , 2019, ALTEX.

[4]  Rui Martins,et al.  Primary standards for measuring flow rates from 100 nl/min to 1 ml/min – gravimetric principle , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  Darwin R. Reyes,et al.  Micro total analysis systems. 2. Analytical standard operations and applications. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  Stephan Klein,et al.  An experimental setup for traceable measurement and calibration of liquid flow rates down to 5 nl/min , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[7]  S. Spearing,et al.  Damage and failure in silicon-glass-metal microfluidic joints for high-pressure MEMS devices , 2006, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[8]  Ratna Tantra,et al.  Role of standard documents in advancing the standardization of microfluidics connectors , 2016 .

[9]  Jens Ducrée,et al.  Efficient Development of Integrated Lab-On-A-Chip Systems Featuring Operational Robustness and Manufacturability , 2019, Micromachines.

[10]  Ali K Yetisen,et al.  Commercialization of microfluidic devices. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  Samuel K Sia,et al.  Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[12]  Douglas Densmore,et al.  3DμF - Interactive Design Environment for Continuous Flow Microfluidic Devices , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Henne van Heeren,et al.  Standards for connecting microfluidic devices , 2012 .

[14]  J. Alves e Sousa,et al.  New EMPIR project – Metrology for Drug Delivery , 2020 .

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Design and uncertainty assessment of a setup for calibration of microfluidic devices down to 5 nL min−1 , 2013 .

[16]  Darwin R. Reyes,et al.  Micro total analysis systems. 1. Introduction, theory, and technology. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  A. Christensen,et al.  Characterization of interconnects used in PDMS microfluidic systems , 2005 .

[18]  C. Klapperich,et al.  Microfluidic diagnostics: time for industry standards , 2009, Expert review of medical devices.

[19]  Anthony J. Kearsley,et al.  Dynamic Measurement of Nanoflows: Realization of an Optofluidic Flow Meter to the Nanoliter-per-Minute Scale. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  Holger Becker,et al.  One size fits all? , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[22]  Rob N. Candler,et al.  Characterization of 3D-printed microfluidic chip interconnects with integrated O-rings , 2014 .

[23]  M. Halter,et al.  Dimensional metrology of lab‐on‐a‐chip internal structures: a comparison of optical coherence tomography with confocal fluorescence microscopy , 2015, Journal of microscopy.

[24]  Andrew Richardson,et al.  Test Strategies for Electrode Degradation in Bio-Fluidic Microsystems , 2011, J. Electron. Test..

[25]  S. Terry,et al.  A gas chromatographic air analyzer fabricated on a silicon wafer , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[26]  John D. Wright,et al.  Microparticle tracking velocimetry as a tool for microfluidic flow measurements , 2017 .

[27]  Ratna Tantra,et al.  Product qualification: a barrier to point-of-care microfluidic-based diagnostics? , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[28]  F. Ogheard,et al.  Development of an optical measurement method for “sampled” micro-volumes and nano-flow rates , 2020 .

[29]  Microfluidic Separation of a Soluble Substance Using Transverse Diffusion in a Layered Flow , 2016, Micromachines.

[30]  U. Rothhaar,et al.  Comparative Delamination Study to Demonstrate the Impact of Container Quality and Nature of Buffer System , 2016, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[31]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Automated, high-throughput measurement of size and growth curves of small organisms in well plates , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[32]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[33]  David Sinton,et al.  Turning the Page: Advancing Paper-Based Microfluidics for Broad Diagnostic Application. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[34]  Elisabeth Wilhelm,et al.  Connecting microfluidic chips using a chemically inert, reversible, multichannel chip-to-world-interface. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[35]  Noah Malmstadt,et al.  Modular, Discrete Micromixer Elements Fabricated by 3D Printing , 2017, Micromachines.