Towards a conceptualization of power in energy transitions

The field of sustainability transitions has recently benefitted from efforts by multiple scholars at better conceptualizing power and politics, and integrating insights from other fields. This article argues for an understanding of power as relational, productive, contingent and situated. I conceptualize power to the aim of understanding and explaining how and where power relations become de/stabilized in energy transitions in poor rural communities. An understanding of power as a relational capacity to act is integrated with a sociotechnical and relational understanding of constitutive power, which enables us to explore the co-production of social relations, technology and nature. The resulting conceptualization is applied to a case of mini-hydropower electrification in Tanzania. I find that electrification simultaneously reinforces social inequality and enhances social mobility. I identify material, symbolic and discursive domains that work as sources of de/stabilization of social hierarchies, producing effects on the system configuration and relations of class and gender.

[1]  J. Butler.  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[2]  Maia Green.  The Development State: Aid, Culture and Civil Society in Tanzania , 2014 .

[3]  Barbara Yngvesson,et al.  The Construction of Subjectivity and the Paradox of Resistance: Reintegrating Feminist Anthropology and Psychology , 1992, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[4]  J. Meadowcroft.  Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[5]  Margaret Skutsch,et al.  The gender issue in energy project planning Welfare, empowerment or efficiency? , 1998 .

[6]  Helene Ahlborg,et al.  Walking along the lines of power. A systems approach to understanding co-emergence of society, technology and nature in processes of rural electrification , 2015 .

[7]  M. Dean,et al.  Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society , 1999 .

[8]  A. Loeber,et al.  Exploring the Micro-politics in Transitions from a Practice Perspective: The Case of Greenhouse Innovation in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[9]  Roel Nahuis,et al.  Where Are the Politics? Perspectives on Democracy and Technology , 2008 .

[10]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  User-led Innovations and Participation Processes: Lessons from Sustainable Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[11]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective , 2016 .

[12]  A. Nightingale.  The Nature of Gender: Work, Gender, and Environment , 2006 .

[13]  J. Ferguson.  Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order , 2006 .

[14]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  It's about dam time: Improving microhydro electrification in Tanzania , 2013 .

[15]  Bonno Pel,et al.  Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’ , 2016 .

[16]  Amy Allen,et al.  Power Trouble: Performativity as Critical Theory , 1998 .

[17]  Anthony Mongameli Mehlwana,et al.  The anthropology of fuels: situational analysis and energy use in urban low-income townships of South Africa , 1997 .

[18]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[19]  M. Swilling,et al.  Developmental States and Sustainability Transitions: Prospects of a Just Transition in South Africa , 2016 .

[20]  J. Grin,et al.  The politics of sustainability transitions , 2016 .

[21]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse , 2016 .

[22]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[23]  A. Nightingale.  Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal , 2011 .

[24]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  The spirit level : why greater equality makes societies stronger , 2011 .

[25]  A. Allen.  Power and the Politics of Difference: Oppression, Empowerment, and Transnational Justice , 2008, Hypatia.

[26]  V. C. Broto.  Innovation Territories and Energy Transitions: Energy, Water and Modernity in Spain, 1939–1975 , 2016 .

[27]  R. A. Schroeder,et al.  “Re‐claiming” Land in The Gambia: Gendered Property Rights and Environmental Intervention , 1997 .

[28]  Joy S. Clancy,et al.  The gender - Energy- Poverty NEXUS : finding the energy to address gender concerns in development , 2002 .

[29]  Mark Howells,et al.  Determinants of electricity demand for newly electrified low-income African households , 2008 .

[30]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[31]  M. Wolsink.  The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[32]  Joerie Frederik De Wit,et al.  Sustainable Energy for All 2015: Progress Toward Sustainable Energy , 2015 .

[33]  Wibke Backhaus,et al.  Judith Butler: Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge: New York 1990, 172 S. (dt. Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1991, 236 S.) , 2016 .

[34]  Ian Scoones,et al.  The politics of green transformations , 2015 .

[35]  C. Bullard.  Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[36]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[37]  B. Agarwal.  Environmental Action, Gender Equity and Women's Participation , 1997 .

[38]  J. Murdoch.  Inhuman/Nonhuman/Human: Actor-Network Theory and the Prospects for a Nondualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society , 1997 .

[39]  Tanja Winther,et al.  The impact of electricity : development, desires and dilemmas , 2008 .

[40]  Elisabeth Ilskog,et al.  Electrification co-operatives bring new light to rural Tanzania , 2005 .

[41]  H. Ahlborg,et al.  Small-scale hydropower in Africa: Socio-technical designs for renewable energy in Tanzanian villages , 2015 .

[42]  Elisabeth Ilskog,et al.  And then they lived sustainably ever after?--Assessment of rural electrification cases by means of indicators , 2008 .

[43]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[44]  E. Mathijs,et al.  Unravelling the (post-)political in Transition Management: Interrogating Pathways towards Sustainable Change , 2016 .

[45]  J. Howe,et al.  Rural household transport in Africa: Reducing the burden on women? , 1993 .

[46]  J. Ribot,et al.  A Theory of Access. , 2009 .

[47]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview , 2011 .

[48]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[49]  Vijay Modi,et al.  Improving Access to Modern Energy Services: Insights from Case Studies , 2012 .

[50]  Joy S. Clancy,et al.  Gender equity in access to and benefits from modern energy and improved energy technologies : world development report background paper , 2011 .

[51]  G. Holden,et al.  Discipline and Punishment , 2012 .

[52]  Tania Murray Li,et al.  Beyond “the State” and Failed Schemes , 2005 .

[53]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[54]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[55]  Charlie M. Shackleton,et al.  Changing energy profiles and consumption patterns following electrification in five rural villages, South Africa , 2006 .

[56]  James Gaede,et al.  A Question of Authenticity: Status Quo Bias and the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook , 2016 .

[57]  S. Gururani.  Forests of Pleasure and Pain: Gendered practices of labor and livelihood in the forests of the Kumaon Himalayas, India , 2002 .