Support of a patient-specific therapeutical acoustic stimulation in tinnitus by numerical modeling

The pathogenesis of tinnitus involves multiple hierarchical levels of auditory processing and appraisal of sensory saliency. Early tinnitus onset is most likely attributed to homeostatic plasticity in the periphery, while the chronification and decompensation are tightly linked to brain areas for the allocation of attentional resources, such as e.g., the thalamocortical feedback loops and the limbic system. Increased spontaneous firing after sensory deafferentation might be sufficient to generate a phantom perception, yet the question why not every peripheral hearing loss automatically elicits a tinnitus sensation is still to be addressed. Utilizing quantitative modeling of multiple hierarchical levels in the auditory pathway, we demonstrate the effects of lateral inhibition on increased spontaneous firing and the resulting elevation of firing regularity and synchronization of neural activity. The presented therapeutical approach is based on the idea of disrupting the heightened regularity of the neural population response in the tinnitus frequency range. This neural activity regularity depends on lateral dispersion of common noise and thus is susceptible for edge effects and might be influenced by a change in neural activity in bordering frequency ranges by fitted acoustical stimulation. We propose the use of patient specifically adapted tailor-made notched acoustic stimulation, utilizing modeling results for the optimal adjustment of the stimulation frequencies to archive a therapeutical edge-effect.

[1]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[2]  Maria Marinaro,et al.  Dynamic Brain - from Neural Spikes to Behaviors , 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Richard Kempter,et al.  Development of tinnitus‐related neuronal hyperactivity through homeostatic plasticity after hearing loss: a computational model , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Xiaohan Zheng,et al.  Computational model of response maps in the dorsal cochlear nucleus , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Nancy Kopell,et al.  Gamma Oscillations and Stimulus Selection , 2008, Neural Computation.

[6]  Tsuyoshi Watanabe,et al.  Hyperperfusion in the lateral temporal cortex, the striatum and the thalamus during complex visual hallucinations: Single photon emission computed tomography findings in patients with Charles Bonnet Syndrome , 2000, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[7]  Herta Flor,et al.  Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment , 2002, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[9]  C. Trenado,et al.  Corticothalamic Feedback Dynamics for Neural Correlates of Auditory Selective Attention , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Ronald J. MacGregor,et al.  Neural and brain modeling , 1987 .

[11]  R. Salvi,et al.  Relationship between auditory thresholds, central spontaneous activity, and hair cell loss after acoustic trauma , 2011, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  Yasuhiro Tsubo,et al.  Synchrony of limit-cycle oscillators induced by random external impulses. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[14]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization in Primary Visual Cortex as a Correlate of Stimulus Selection , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Arriaga Tinnitus: Theory and Management , 2005 .

[16]  W. Burke,et al.  The neural basis of Charles Bonnet hallucinations: a hypothesis , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Winfried Schlee,et al.  High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferentation , 2006, Hearing Research.

[19]  M. Savastano Tinnitus with or without hearing loss: are its characteristics different? , 2008, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[20]  R. Romo,et al.  Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  C. Micheyl,et al.  An auditory negative after-image as a human model of tinnitus , 2000, Hearing Research.

[22]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[23]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Cortex Is Driven by Weak but Synchronously Active Thalamocortical Synapses , 2006, Science.

[24]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Impact of Higher-Order Correlations on Coincidence Distributions of Massively Parallel Data , 2007, Summer School on Neural Networks.

[25]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  R Kakigi,et al.  Lateral inhibition and habituation of the human auditory cortex , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Asymmetric lateral inhibitory neural activity in the auditory system: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Robert Hansen,et al.  Partial phase synchronization of neural populations due to random Poisson inputs , 2008, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.