Gender difference in N170 elicited under oddball task

BackgroundSome studies have reported gender differences in N170, a face-selective event-related potential (ERP) component. This study investigated gender differences in N170 elicited under oddball paradigm in order to clarify the effect of task demand on gender differences in early facial processing.FindingsTwelve males and 10 females discriminated targets (emotional faces) from non-targets (emotionally neutral faces) under an oddball paradigm, pressing a button as quickly as possible in response to the target. Clear N170 was elicited in response to target and non-target stimuli in both males and females. However, females showed more negative amplitude of N170 in response to target compared with non-target, while males did not show different N170 responses between target and non-target.ConclusionsThe present results suggest that females have a characteristic of allocating attention at an early stage when responding to faces actively (target) compared to viewing faces passively (non-target). This supports previous findings suggesting that task demand is an important factor in gender differences in N170.

[1]  Judith A. Hall.  Gender Effects in Decoding Nonverbal Cues , 1978 .

[2]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Cindy L. Ehlers,et al.  Gender differences in electrophysiological responses to facial stimuli , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[4]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  U. Habel,et al.  Gender differences in regional cerebral activity during sadness , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[6]  E. McClure.  A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  B. Rossion,et al.  Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[8]  William D S Killgore,et al.  Sex differences in amygdala activation during the perception of facial affect , 2001, Neuroreport.

[9]  M. Eimer,et al.  An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing , 2002, Neuroreport.

[10]  A. Eagly,et al.  A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Chetwyn C. H. Chan,et al.  Gender differences in neural correlates of recognition of happy and sad faces in humans assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  M. Eimer,et al.  The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  R Bruyer,et al.  Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Sex differences in the perception of affective facial expressions: Do men really lack emotional sensitivity? , 2005, Cognitive Processing.

[15]  F. Guillem,et al.  Gender differences in memory processing: Evidence from event-related potentials to faces , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  M. Zotto,et al.  Gender and parental status affect the visual cortical response to infant facial expression , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[18]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Face Coding Is Bilateral in the Female Brain , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Shihui Han,et al.  Sex differences in face gender recognition: An event-related potential study , 2010, Brain Research.

[21]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Sex difference in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant social information: An event-related potential study of familiar face recognition , 2011, Brain Research.

[22]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Sex differences in callosal transfer and hemispheric specialization for face coding , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Takayuki Nishimura,et al.  Effect of empathy trait on attention to various facial expressions: evidence from N170 and late positive potential (LPP) , 2014, Journal of Physiological Anthropology.