The Impact of Ownership Unbundling on Cost Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from the New Zealand Electricity Distribution Sector

Several countries around the world have introduced reforms to the electric power sector. One important element of these reforms is the introduction of an unbundling process, i.e., the separation of the competitive activities of supply and production from the monopole activity of transmission and distribution of electricity. There are several forms of unbundling: functional, legal and ownership. New Zealand, for instance, adopted an ownership unbundling in 1998. As discussed in the literature, ownership unbundling produces benefits and costs. One of the benefits may be an improvement in the level of the productive efficiency of the companies due to the use of the inputs in just one activity and a greater level of transparency for the regulator. This paper analyzes the cost efficiency of 28 electricity distribution companies in New Zealand for the period between 1996 and 2011. Using a stochastic frontier panel data model, a total cost function and a variable cost function are estimated in order to evaluate the impact of ownership unbundling on the level of cost efficiency. The results indicate that ownership separation of electricity generation and retail operations from the distribution network has a positive effect on the cost efficiency of distribution companies in New Zealand. The estimated effect of ownership separation suggests a positive average one-off shift in the level of cost efficiency by 0.242 in the short-run and 0.144 in the long-run.

[1]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[2]  M. Filippini.  Economies of scale and utilization in the Swiss electric power distribution industry , 1996 .

[3]  Paul H. L. Nillesen,et al.  Ownership Unbundling in Electricity Distribution: Empirical Evidence from New Zealand , 2011 .

[4]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74 , 1981 .

[5]  Daisy Shen,et al.  Electricity Market Regulatory Reform and Competition – Case Study of the New Zealand Electricity Market , 2012 .

[6]  Geoff Bertram.  Restructuring the New Zealand Electricity Sector 1984–2005 , 2006 .

[7]  L. G. Neuberg,et al.  Two issues in the municipal ownership of electric power distribution systems. [Statistical/econometric scrutiny] , 1977 .

[8]  Francisco Javier Ramos-Real,et al.  Cost functions and the electric utility industry. A contribution to the debate on deregulation , 2005 .

[9]  Hung-Jen Wang,et al.  Heteroscedasticity and Non-Monotonic Efficiency Effects of a Stochastic Frontier Model , 2002 .

[10]  Federico Belotti,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis using Stata , 2012 .

[11]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms , 1991 .

[12]  M. Farsi,et al.  An analysis of cost efficiency in Swiss multi-utilities , 2008 .

[13]  Barbara E. Baarsma,et al.  Divorce comes at a price: An ex ante welfare analysis of ownership unbundling of the distribution and commercial companies in the Dutch energy sector☆ , 2009 .

[14]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  Energy Market Integration in East Asia: Theories, Electricity Sector and Subsidies , 2011 .

[15]  William H. Greene,et al.  Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model , 2005 .

[16]  A. Lansink,et al.  Analyzing the impact of direct subsidies on the performance of the Greek Olive Farms with a non-monotonic efficiency effects model , 2008 .

[17]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach , 1988 .

[18]  W. Greene.  Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models , 2002 .

[19]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The arguments for and against ownership unbundling of energy transmission networks , 2008 .

[20]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Economies of vertical integration in the Swiss electricity sector , 2010 .

[21]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[22]  Dan R. Twaddle,et al.  Price-Cost Margins and Profit Rates in New Zealand Electricity Distribution Networks Since 1994: the Cost of Light Handed Regulation , 2005 .

[23]  Giannis Karagiannis,et al.  The Impact of Direct Income Transfers of CAP on Greek Olive Farms’ Performance: Using a Non‐Monotonic Inefficiency Effects Model , 2011 .