Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies.

PURPOSE To assess compliance and resultant radiation dose reduction with new pediatric chest and abdominal computed tomographic (CT) protocols based on patient weight, clinical indication, number of prior CT studies, and automatic exposure control. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was waived. The new pediatric CT protocols, which were organized into six color zones based on clinical indications and number of prior CT examinations in a given patient, were retrospectively assessed. Scanning parameters were adjusted on the basis of patient weight. For gradual dose reduction, pediatric CT (n = 692) examinations were performed in three phases of incremental stepwise dose reduction during a 17-month period. There were 245 male patients and 193 female patients (mean age, 12.6 years). Two radiologists independently reviewed CT images for image quality. Data were analyzed by using multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS Compliance with the new protocols in the early stage of implementation (chest CT, 58.9%; abdominal CT, 65.2%) was lower than in the later stage (chest CT, 88%; abdominal CT, 82%) (P < .001). For chest CT, there was 52.6% (9.1 vs 19.2 mGy) to 85.4% (2.8 vs 19.2 mGy) dose reduction in the early stage of implementation and 73.5% (4.9 vs 18.5 mGy) to 83.2% (3.1 vs 18.5 mGy) dose reduction in the later stages compared with dose at noncompliant examinations (P < .001); there was no loss of clinically relevant image quality. For abdominal CT, there was 34.3% (9.0 vs 13.7 mGy) to 80.2% (2.7 vs 13.7 mGy) dose reduction in the early stage of implementation and 62.4% (6.5 vs 17.3) to 83.8% (2.8 vs 17.3 mGy) dose reduction in the later stage (P < .001). CONCLUSION Substantial dose reduction and high compliance can be obtained with pediatric CT protocols tailored to clinical indications, patient weight, and number of prior studies.

[1]  Ulrich Baum,et al.  Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose) , 2002, European Radiology.

[2]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. , 2005, Radiology.

[4]  D. Tudorascu,et al.  Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  H. Tiddens,et al.  Dose reduction for CT in children with cystic fibrosis: is it feasible to reduce the number of images per scan? , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[8]  R. Dorffner,et al.  [Lung nodule detection with ultra-low-dose CT in routine follow-up of cancer patients]. , 2005, RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (Print).

[9]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Remy,et al.  Asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases: evaluation with low-dose four-detector row spiral CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  D. Jaramillo,et al.  Multidetector row CT in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  B. Wall,et al.  Implementation of DRLs in the UK. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  C. Yi,et al.  Multidetector CT of bronchiectasis: effect of radiation dose on image quality. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Kalra,et al.  16-MDCT of the posttraumatic pediatric elbow: optimum parameters and associated radiation dose. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[18]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.