Cooperation Systems in Research Networks - Case Evidence of Network (Mis)Fit and Adoption Challenges

University research is increasingly organised in inter-organisational networks. As part of its 6 research framework, the European Commission (EC) funded a total of 130 so called networks of excellence (NoEs), a special kind of network with the purpose of strengthening and developing community, scientific and technological excellence by way of integrating existing and emerging research activities and by exchanging knowledge. In such NoEs electronic collaboration platforms are typically implemented to support collaboration between the individuals from the various research institutions. In this paper we investigate the adoption of a collaboration platform in one NoE case the GARNET network. We find evidence that the platform is used for administrative purposes and to support the organisation of events. However, a web log analysis reveals a lack of adoption for its actual purpose – the support of collaborative research and knowledge exchange. A social network analysis further uncovers that the GARNET network is very fragmented on the social level, which points to a misfit between network structure and the positioning of the collaboration platform. Our findings lead us to suggest immediate next steps for this NoE and also point to general implications for network designers and future research in the domain.

[1]  Mark Ebers,et al.  The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks , 2000 .

[2]  M. Ebers,et al.  Explaining Inter-Organizational Network Formation , 1997 .

[3]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Is the V-form the next generation organisation? An analysis of challenges, pitfalls and remedies of ICT-enabled virtual organisations based on social capital theory , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Zur Rolle von Kooperationssystemen in verteilten Forschungsnetzen - Ergebnisse einer Social Network Analysis im Network of Excellence GARNET , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[5]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware for an emerging virtual organization , 1997 .

[7]  Dimitra Petrakaki,et al.  Recognising the Limits of Virtual Organizations , 2007 .

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Government Funding of E-collaboration Research in the European Union: A Comparison with the United States Model , 2007, Int. J. e Collab..

[10]  Doug Schuler,et al.  Social computing , 1994, CACM.

[11]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Social Computing: An Overview , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Wolfgang Sodeur Strukturanalyse sozialer Netzwerke : Konzepte, Modelle, Methoden , 2005 .

[14]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[15]  Cliff Figallo,et al.  Building the Knowledge Management Network: Best Practices, Tools, and Techniques for Putting Conversation to Work , 2002 .

[16]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[17]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[18]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[19]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Adaption von Kollaborationssystemen in Forschungsnetzwerken - Ergebnisse einer Web Usage Mining-Studie im Network of Excellence GARNET , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[20]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Sozialkapital und Kooperation , 2005 .

[21]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..