Cost drivers of software corrective maintenance: An empirical study in two companies

To estimate the corrective software maintenance effort, we must know the factors that have the strongest influence on corrective maintenance activities. In this study, we have analyzed activities and effort of correcting 810 software defects in one Norwegian software company and 577 software defects in another. We compared the defect profiles according to the defect correction effort. We also analyzed defect descriptions and recorded discussions between developers in the course of correcting defects in order to understand what led to the high cost of correcting some types of defects. The study shows that size and complexity of the software to be maintained, maintainers?' experience, and tool and process support are the most influential cost drivers of corrective maintenance in one company, while domain knowledge is one of the main cost drivers of corrective maintenance in the other company. This illustrates that models for estimating software corrective maintenance effort have to be customized based on the defect profiles and cost drivers of each company and project to be useful.

[1]  William M. Evanco.  Prediction models for software fault correction effort , 2001, Proceedings Fifth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering.

[2]  Paolo Nesi,et al.  Estimation and Prediction Metrics for Adaptive Maintenance Effort of Object-Oriented Systems , 2001, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[3]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Two case studies in measuring software maintenance effort , 1998, Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272).

[4]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  The software maintenance project effort estimation model based on function points , 2003, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[5]  Mukund A. Sanglikar,et al.  An Analysis of Effort Variance in Software Maintenance Projects , 2007, SCSS.

[6]  Thomas M. Pigoski.  Practical Software Maintenance: Best Practices for Managing Your Software Investment , 1996 .

[7]  Nandlal L. Sarda,et al.  Effort drivers in maintenance outsourcing-an experiment using Taguchi's methodology , 2003, Seventh European Conference onSoftware Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[8]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  The prediction ability of experienced software maintainers , 2000, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering.

[9]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[10]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Predicting maintenance effort with function points , 1997, 1997 Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance.

[11]  Robert B. Grady,et al.  Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement , 1992 .

[12]  Andrea De Lucia,et al.  Assessing effort estimation models for corrective maintenance through empirical studies , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[13]  D. Francis.  Review of Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd edition) , 1999 .

[14]  Sandip C. Patel,et al.  A metrics-based software maintenance effort model , 2004, Eighth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, 2004. CSMR 2004. Proceedings..

[15]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  Impact of experience on maintenance skills , 2002, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[16]  Capers Jones.  Software quality - analysis and guidelines for success , 1997 .

[17]  L. Erlikh,et al.  Leveraging legacy system dollars for e-business , 2000 .

[18]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  An empirical study of software maintenance tasks , 1995, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[19]  Inderpal S. Bhandari,et al.  Orthogonal Defect Classification - A Concept for In-Process Measurements , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[20]  Narasimhaiah Gorla,et al.  Debugging Effort Estimation Using Software Metrics , 1990, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[21]  Arun Kumar Misra,et al.  Estimating software maintenance effort: a neural network approach , 2008, ISEC '08.

[22]  James P. Cain,et al.  A quantitative comparison of perfective and corrective software maintenance , 1997, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[23]  Min Xie,et al.  A Study of the Effect of Imperfect Debugging on Software Development Cost , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[24]  J. Gosby.  MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[25]  William M. Evanco,et al.  Modeling the effort to correct faults , 1995, J. Syst. Softw..

[26]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  Experience With the Accuracy of Software Maintenance Task Effort Prediction Models , 1995, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..