Interactions between nodding thistle seed predators
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. L. Woodburn,et al. CONTEXT‐DEPENDENT BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AN INVASIVE THISTLE , 2005 .
[2] E. S. Delfosse. Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. , 1990 .
[3] P. Harris. Feeding strategy, coexistence and impact of insects in spotted knapweed capitula. , 1990 .
[4] K. Shea,et al. Modeling for Management of Invasive Species: Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) in New Zealand1 , 2004 .
[5] Andy W. Sheppard,et al. Frontiers of population ecology , 1997 .
[6] D. Kelly,et al. Demography, seed biology and biological control of Carduus nutans in New Zealand. , 1990 .
[7] D. Kelly,et al. Why nodding thistle receptacle weevil destroys so little nodding thistle seed in canterbury , 1991 .
[8] J. Hoffmann,et al. Interspecific competition between Rhinocyllus conicus and Urophora solstitialis, two biocontrol agents released in Australia against Carduus nutans. , 1996 .
[9] D. Briese,et al. The contribution of biological control to the management of thistles. , 1996 .
[10] P. Harris. Classical biocontrol of weeds: Its definitions, selection of effective agents, and administrative-political problems , 1991 .
[11] Katriona Shea,et al. ESTIMATING BIOCONTROL AGENT IMPACT WITH MATRIX MODELS: CARDUUS NUTANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 1998 .
[12] M. McNeill,et al. INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION BETWEEN RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS AND UROPHORA SOLSTITIALIS L. ON NODDING THISTLE IN CANTERBURY , 2005 .