Computational Models of Spoken Word Recognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
Harlan D. Harris | James S. Magnuson | Daniel Mirman | Daniel Mirman | D. Mirman | J. Magnuson | H. Harris
[1] A. Samuel. Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes , 1996 .
[2] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .
[3] Michael J Cortese,et al. Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .
[4] Lori L. Holt,et al. Response to McQueen et al.: Theoretical and empirical arguments support interactive processing , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[5] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.
[6] Gerry Altmann,et al. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..
[7] M. Tanenhaus,et al. The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[8] Colin M. Brown,et al. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .
[10] James L. McClelland,et al. Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes , 1988 .
[11] Brian MacWhinney,et al. The emergence of language. , 1999 .
[12] M. Pitt,et al. Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation , 2003 .
[13] J. Perkell,et al. Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .
[14] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .
[15] Ted J. Strauss,et al. jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[16] Tamiko Azuma,et al. Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.
[17] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[18] James Pustejovsky,et al. The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.
[19] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[21] Athanassios Protopapas. Connectionist modeling of speech perception , 1999 .
[22] James M. McQueen,et al. The ghost of Christmas future: Didn't Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus and Aslin (2003) , 2003 .
[23] W Marslen-Wilson,et al. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.
[24] Paul D. Allopenna,et al. Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .
[25] Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al. Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] W. Marslen-Wilson. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.
[27] M. Masson. A distributed memory model of semantic priming. , 1995 .
[28] Anne Cutler,et al. Twenty-first century psycholinguistics : four cornerstones , 2005 .
[29] David C. Plaut,et al. Strategic Control Over Rate of Processing in Word Reading: A Computational Investigation of the Tempo-Naming Task , 2000 .
[30] Arthur G. Samuel,et al. Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring , 1997 .
[31] James L. McClelland. Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[32] Lori L. Holt,et al. Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[33] W. Cooper,et al. Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. , 1980 .
[34] R. Ellis,et al. Connectionist psychology: A text with readings , 1999 .
[35] A. Jacobs,et al. Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .
[36] A. Samuel,et al. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.
[37] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[38] R. M. Warren. Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.
[39] Anne Cutler,et al. Are there really interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[40] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations , 1997 .
[41] Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al. Bayesian inference and attentional modulation in the visual cortex , 2005, Neuroreport.
[42] S. Grossberg,et al. Neural dynamics of variable-rate speech categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] D. Norris,et al. The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[44] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[45] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[46] S. Blumstein,et al. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.
[47] James L. McClelland,et al. Computational and behavioral investigations of lexically induced delays in phoneme recognition , 2005 .
[48] D. Norris. Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.
[49] S. Goldinger. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.
[50] Anne Cutler,et al. Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.
[51] A. Samuel. Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[52] William D Marslen-Wilson,et al. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.
[53] Karl J. Friston. Learning and inference in the brain , 2003, Neural Networks.
[54] A. Jacobs,et al. Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .
[55] T. S. Lee,et al. Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[56] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Lexical Representation and Process , 1989, Language.
[57] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[58] Arthur G. Samuel,et al. Phonemic Restoration: Insights From a New Methodology , 1981 .
[59] S. Grossberg,et al. The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. , 2000 .
[60] James S. Magnuson,et al. Simple Recurrent Networks and Competition Effects in Spoken Word Recognition , 2000 .
[61] Joseph P. Levy,et al. Connectionist models of memory and language , 1995 .
[62] D. Norris,et al. Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.
[63] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .
[64] A. Samuel,et al. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[65] D. Massaro. Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[66] D. Norris,et al. Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.
[67] P. Luce,et al. A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[68] Jay I. Myung,et al. Modeling the word recognition data of Vitevitch and Luce (1998): Is it ARTful? , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[69] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[70] D Norris,et al. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[71] Dennis H. Klatt,et al. Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .
[72] M. Gareth Gaskell,et al. Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[73] James L. McClelland,et al. The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. , 2001, Psychological review.
[74] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[75] S. Goldinger,et al. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[76] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[77] Stephen Grossberg,et al. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation , 2004, Neural Networks.
[78] Jay I. Myung,et al. Global model analysis by parameter space partitioning. , 2019, Psychological review.
[79] Richard Shillcock,et al. Cognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting , 1993 .
[80] C M Connine,et al. Auditory word recognition: extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[81] Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .
[82] James S. Magnuson,et al. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past , 2003, Cogn. Sci..
[83] R. Cole. Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech , 1973 .
[84] John J. L. Morton,et al. Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .
[85] Rajesh P. N. Rao. Bayesian Computation in Recurrent Neural Circuits , 2004, Neural Computation.
[86] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[87] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[88] R. O’Reilly,et al. Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .
[89] Louis ten Bosch,et al. How Should a Speech Recognizer Work? , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[90] Anne Pier Salverda,et al. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.