Observations and model predictions of substorm auroral asymmetries in the conjugate hemispheres

[1] Based on imaging data from the Polar VIS Earth camera and the IMAGE-FUV instruments we have documented how the IMF orientation and the dipole tilt angle act as the main and the secondary controlling factors of the relative displacement of the aurora in the conjugate hemispheres. Comparing our results with the asymmetries predicted by recent empirical magnetospheric models, we show that the assumed partial penetration of the IMF into the magnetosphere is clearly supported by observations, but the modeled conjugate shifts were found to be an order of magnitude smaller than the observed ones.

[1]  J. Birn,et al.  A simple model of core field generation during plasmoid evolution , 1996 .

[2]  L. Frank,et al.  Simultaneous images of the northern and southern auroras from the Polar spacecraft: An auroral substorm , 2003 .

[3]  C. Russell,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic field control of magnetotail magnetic field geometry: IMP 8 observations , 1994 .

[4]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations: A NEW MAGNETOSPHERE MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL, 2 , 2002 .

[5]  A. Richmond.  Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using Magnetic Apex Coordinates. , 1995 .

[6]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Excitation and decay of solar-wind driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system , 1992 .

[7]  J. Slavin,et al.  The distant magnetotail's response to a strong interplanetary magnetic field By - Twisting, flattening, and field line bending , 1985 .

[8]  O. Yagodkina,et al.  Aurora conjugacy during substorms' Coordinated Antarctic ground and Polar Ultraviolet observations , 2001 .

[9]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  Annual and semiannual variations of the location and intensity of large‐scale field‐aligned currents , 2005 .

[10]  N. Østgaard,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic field control of the location of substorm onset and auroral features in the conjugate hemispheres , 2004 .

[11]  D. McEwen,et al.  Optical auroral conjugacy: Viking UV Imager—South Pole Station ground data , 1990 .

[12]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Dependence of convective flows and particle precipitation in the high‐latitude dayside ionosphere on the X and Y components of the interplanetary magnetic field , 1991 .

[13]  T. Saemundsson,et al.  Conjugacy of isolated auroral arcs and nonconjugate auroral breakups , 1998 .

[14]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  Effects of the solar wind conditions on the global magnetospheric configuration as deduced from data-based field models , 1996 .

[15]  N. Tsyganenko,et al.  A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 1. Mathematical structure , 2002 .

[16]  A. Lui.  Solar Wind Influence on Magnetotail Configuration and Dynamics , 1986 .

[17]  C. Carlson,et al.  FAST observations of the solar illumination dependence of upflowing electron beams in the auroral zone , 2004 .

[18]  T. Mukai,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic field control of dayside ion conics , 2000 .

[19]  T. Hill,et al.  Mapping of the solar wind electric field to the Earth's polar caps , 1989 .

[20]  H. Stenbaek-Nielsen,et al.  Conjugate auroras and the interplanetary magnetic field , 1997 .

[21]  J. Dungey.  Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones , 1961 .

[22]  S. Wing,et al.  A large statistical study of the entry of interplanetary magnetic field Y-component into the magnetosphere , 1995 .

[23]  David G. Sibeck,et al.  Observation of IMF and seasonal effects in the location of auroral substorm onset , 2001 .

[24]  James A. Slavin,et al.  Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind , 1998 .

[25]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Models of flux ropes embedded in a harris neutral sheet: Force‐free solutions in low and high beta plasmas , 1995 .

[26]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  Modeling the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field confined within a realistic magnetopause , 1995 .

[27]  R. Elphinstone,et al.  The configuration of the auroral distribution for interplanetary magnetic field Bz northward: 1. IMF Bx and By dependencies as observed by the Viking satellite , 1990 .