On Data Space Selection and Data Processing for Parameter Identification in a Reaction-Diffusion Model Based on FRAP Experiments

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widely used measurement technique to determine the mobility of fluorescent molecules within living cells. While the experimental setup and protocol for FRAP experiments are usually fixed, data (pre)processing represents an important issue. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we formulate and solve the problem of relevant FRAP data selection. The theoretical findings are illustrated by the comparison of the results of parameter identification when the full data set was used and the case when the irrelevant data set (data with negligible impact on the confidence interval of the estimated parameters) was removed from the data space. Second, we analyze and compare two approaches of FRAP data processing. Our proposition, surprisingly for the FRAP community, claims that the data set represented by the FRAP recovery curves in form of a time series (integrated data approach commonly used by the FRAP community) leads to a larger confidence interval compared to the full (spatiotemporal) data approach.

[1]  Stepán Papácek,et al.  Estimation of diffusivity of phycobilisomes on thylakoid membrane based on spatio-temporal FRAP images , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Ctirad Matonoha,et al.  Phycobilisome Mobility and Its Role in the Regulation of Light Harvesting in Red Algae1[W] , 2014, Plant Physiology.

[4]  Marc E. Levenston,et al.  Improved Estimation of Solute Diffusivity Through Numerical Analysis of FRAP Experiments , 2009 .

[5]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Are assumptions about the model type necessary in reaction-diffusion modeling? A FRAP application. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Kouroush Sadegh Zadeh,et al.  A class of exact solutions for biomacromolecule diffusion-reaction in live cells. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Ivo F. Sbalzarini,et al.  Analysis, modeling, and simulation of diffusion processes in cell biology , 2006 .

[8]  R. Kaňa Mobility of photosynthetic proteins , 2013, Photosynthesis Research.

[9]  Howard J. Worman,et al.  Nuclear Membrane Dynamics and Reassembly in Living Cells: Targeting of an Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein in Interphase and Mitosis , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Radek Kaňa,et al.  Immobility of phycobilins in the thylakoid lumen of a cryptophyte suggests that protein diffusion in the lumen is very restricted , 2009, FEBS letters.

[11]  C. Mullineaux,et al.  Mobility of photosynthetic complexes in thylakoid membranes , 1997, Nature.

[12]  G. Machiedo,et al.  Functional longevity of intraperitoneal drains , 1976 .

[13]  T. Tsay,et al.  Spatial Fourier analysis of video photobleaching measurements. Principles and optimization. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Stefan Kindermann,et al.  FRAP & FLIP: Two Sides of the Same Coin? , 2015, IWBBIO.

[15]  H. T. Banks,et al.  A sensitivity matrix based methodology for inverse problem formulation , 2020, 2004.06831.

[16]  Fredrik Höök,et al.  A method improving the accuracy of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[17]  R. Kass Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications , 1990 .

[18]  C. Matonoha,et al.  ON ESTIMATION OF DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT BASED ON SPATIO-TEMPORAL FRAP IMAGES: AN INVERSE ILL-POSED PROBLEM , 2012 .

[19]  Adel Shirmohammadi,et al.  Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling , 2006, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[20]  Davide Mazza,et al.  FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know? , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.