Integration of Information Technology Software in a Civil Engineering Program – Learning Styles Considered

Expectations of information technology skills continue to grow in the Civil Engineering profession, demanding that universities include the development of information technology knowledge in their vision and goals, and ABET outcomes and objectives. Since 2007, the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy has evolved their approach to integrating information technology into multiple courses across the program. In 2009, a comprehensive study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of this approach and three specific challenges were identified: limited faculty capacity to maintain pace with the information technologies, complexities and costs of the technologies, and difficulty of integrating the technologies across a program rather than a one-course exposure. In the following years, these challenges were addressed and teaching approach to information technology evolved to address these challenges. In 2011, a follow-up study was completed to assess the evolution and indentify future work to continue to evolve the approach. Specifically, it was reported that through the evolution and assessment it become readily apparent that there was a unique and strong relationship between learning styles and teaching/tutoring approaches. Although this is an obvious statement relative to all learning and teaching environments, the demands of teaching information technology across multiple domains of development (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) made this connection even more critical. This paper will discuss the study of the learning styles considerations in teaching information technology and how teaching/tutoring approaches can best be developed to address student learning styles across multiple domains of development. Longitudinal assessment results will be compared to the 2009 and 2011 studies, along with other assessments. It is believed that these results, and the continued assessment of the teaching approach at this institution, will provide valuable insight to other programs to help them overcome the challenges of teaching information technologies.

[1]  Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.  Beyond the Cognitive: The Affective Domain, Values, and the Achievement of the Vision , 2009 .

[2]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century : Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future , 2004 .

[3]  R. Felder Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. , 1993 .

[4]  Thomas J. Siller,et al.  Information Technology in Civil Engineering Curriculum , 2005 .

[5]  David J. Flinders,et al.  Bloom's taxonomy : a forty-year retrospective , 1996 .

[6]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs. , 1994 .

[7]  Joseph Bordogna,et al.  TOMORROW'S CIVIL SYSTEMS ENGINEER--THE MASTER INTEGRATOR , 1998 .

[8]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  MATTERS OF STYLE , 2004 .

[9]  Davis,et al.  Land Development Handbook: Planning, Engineering, and Surveying , 1995 .

[10]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[11]  Gisele Ragusa,et al.  Performance assessment for civil engineering curriculum , 2008 .

[12]  Paul D. Minton,et al.  Statistics: The Exploration and Analysis of Data , 2002, Technometrics.

[13]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  How students learn: adapting teaching styles to learning styles , 1988, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference.

[14]  Aaron Hill,et al.  A Direct Assessment Technique That Works , 2007 .

[15]  R. Felder,et al.  Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles* , 2005 .

[16]  G. Wayne Clough Civil Engineering in the Next Millennium , 2000 .

[17]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .