3-D FDTD simulation of shear waves for evaluation of complex modulus imaging

The Navier equation describing shear wave propagation in 3-D viscoelastic media is solved numerically with a finite differences time domain (FDTD) method. Solutions are formed in terms of transverse scatterer velocity waves and then verified via comparison to measured wave fields in heterogenous hydrogel phantoms. The numerical algorithm is used as a tool to study the effects on complex shear modulus estimation from wave propagation in heterogeneous viscoelastic media. We used an algebraic Helmholtz inversion (AHI) technique to solve for the complex shear modulus from simulated and experimental velocity data acquired in 2-D and 3-D. Although 3-D velocity estimates are required in general, there are object geometries for which 2-D inversions provide accurate estimations of the material properties. Through simulations and experiments, we explored artifacts generated in elastic and dynamic-viscous shear modulus images related to the shear wavelength and average viscosity.

[1]  J. Virieux.  P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method , 1986 .

[2]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Model-based complex shear modulus reconstruction: A Bayesian approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[3]  J. F. Greenleaf,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  A. Arakawa,et al.  Numerical methods used in atmospheric models , 1976 .

[5]  I. Sack,et al.  Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  K. Parker,et al.  "Sonoelasticity" images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  The role of viscosity in the impulse diffraction field of elastic waves induced by the acoustic radiation force , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Shigao Chen,et al.  Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  M. Fink,et al.  8C-5 Full 3D Inversion of the Viscoelasticity Wave Propagation Problem for 3D Ultrasound Elastography in Breast Cancer Diagnosis , 2007, 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.

[10]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Quantifying elasticity and viscosity from measurement of shear wave speed dispersion. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Hendzel,et al.  Mechanotransduction from the ECM to the genome: Are the pieces now in place? , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[12]  L. S. Taylor,et al.  Three-dimensional sonoelastography: principles and practices. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Dispersion and Shear Modulus Measurements of Porcine Liver , 2010, Ultrasonic imaging.

[14]  J. Kristek,et al.  3D Heterogeneous Staggered-grid Finite-difference Modeling of Seismic Motion with Volume Harmonic and Arithmetic Averaging of Elastic Moduli and Densities , 2002 .

[15]  Michael F Insana,et al.  Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  Marko Orescanin,et al.  Shear modulus estimation with vibrating needle stimulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  P. R. Pinnock,et al.  The mechanical properties of solid polymers , 1966 .

[18]  Kenneth Hoyt,et al.  Real-time shear velocity imaging using sonoelastographic techniques. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  A. Giannoula,et al.  Narrowband shear wave generation by a finite-amplitude radiation force: The fundamental component , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  D. Durran.  Numerical methods for wave equations in geophysical fluid dynamics , 1999 .

[21]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  Waymond R. Scott,et al.  A finite-difference model to study the elastic-wave interactions with buried land mines , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Michael F Insana,et al.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[24]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Proposed Inflow/Outflow Boundary Condition for Direct Computation of Aerodynamic Sound , 1997 .

[25]  Marko Orescanin,et al.  Material properties from acoustic radiation force step response. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Armando Manduca,et al.  An error analysis of Helmholtz inversion for incompressible shear, vibration elastography with application to filter-design for tissue characterization , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).