The evaluation of university inventions: Judging a book by its cover?

This study examines the influence of inventor appearance on how technology licensing officers perceive the commercial potential of new university inventions. An experiment with technology licensing officers at Carnegie I research universities in the United States serves to manipulate inventor appearance in otherwise identical invention disclosures. The experiment reveals that licensing officers perceive inventions by more attractive inventors (inventors with a professional appearance) to have more commercial potential. These findings have several critical implications for university technology commercialization.

[1]  Mike Wright,et al.  The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications , 2005 .

[2]  R. Ashmore,et al.  Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive—Social psychological conceptualization , 1979 .

[3]  Michael Ahearne,et al.  If looks could sell: Moderation and mediation of the attractiveness effect on salesperson performance , 1999 .

[4]  Tanya Rosenblat,et al.  Why Beauty Matters ∗ , 2005 .

[5]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[6]  J. Driskell,et al.  Beauty as Status , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  S. Macintyre,et al.  Does Perceived Physical Attractiveness in Adolescence Predict Better Socioeconomic Position in Adulthood? Evidence from 20 Years of Follow Up in a Population Cohort Study , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[9]  Bradley J. Ruffle,et al.  Are Good-Looking People More Employable? , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[11]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence : a meta-analytic review , 1995 .

[12]  Jerome B. Kernan,et al.  Social perception and interpersonal influence: Some consequences of the physical attractiveness stereotype in a personal selling setting , 1993 .

[13]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. , 1974 .

[14]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[16]  M. Wright,et al.  Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions , 2005 .

[17]  R. Baron,et al.  Exporting Social Psychology: Effects of Attractiveness on Perceptions of Entrepreneurs, Their Ideas for New Products, and Their Financial Success1 , 2006 .

[18]  J. Scholz,et al.  Facial Attractiveness and Lifetime Earnings: Evidence from a Cohort Study , 2015, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  C. Borch,et al.  ABOUT FACE: THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FACIAL APPEARANCE AND STATUS ATTAINMENT AMONG MILITARY PERSONNEL , 2011 .

[20]  Kathryn Stafford,et al.  Beauty Revisited: The Impact of Attractiveness, Ability, and Personality in the Assessment of Employment Suitability , 2009 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[22]  E. F. Stone-Romero,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS ON JOB‐RELATED OUTCOMES: A META‐ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES , 2003 .

[23]  Daniel S. Hamermesh,et al.  Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful , 2011 .

[24]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .