Radiation doses to patients undergoing scoliosis radiography.

In this study we computed the radiation doses associated with scoliosis radiography and investigated how these radiation doses are influenced by the weight of the patient. We recorded the radiographic technique factors of 61 consecutive patients (46 females and 15 males) undergoing scoliosis radiography. A wedge-shaped aluminium filter attenuated the X-ray beam in the "chest region" relative to the "abdomen region". X-ray tube air kerma output factors (microGy mAs-1) and half value layers (HVLs) were determined experimentally for the "chest region" and "abdomen region". The energy imparted to each patient was computed from the air kerma area product, X-ray beam HVL and measured patient thickness. Values of patient effective dose were obtained using effective dose-to-energy conversion factors for specified radiographic projections, taking into account each patient's weight. The median patient age was 17 years, and the median patient weight was 53 kg. Entrance skin air kerma values in the "chest region" were approximately a factor of four lower than those in the "abdomen region". The air kerma values increased by a factor of two when the patient weight increased from 30 kg to 70 kg. Approximately 80% of the total energy imparted to a patient undergoing a scoliosis examination was in the "abdomen region", with the remaining 20% imparted to the "chest region". Energy imparted increased with patient weight, and was approximately 3 mJ for a 30 kg patient and approximately 8 mJ for a 70 kg adult patient. Effective doses showed little correlation with patient weight, with an average-sized patient (50 kg) receiving an effective dose of approximately 140 microSv. Patients undergoing scoliosis radiography receive effective doses that are low in comparison with other types of radiographic examination.

[1]  E. C. Gregg,et al.  Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  T. Padikal,et al.  Medical Physics Data Book , 1982 .

[3]  W Huda,et al.  Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[4]  P. Shrimpton,et al.  The measurement of energy imparted to patients during diagnostic x-ray examinations using the Diamentor exposure-area product meter. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  R. Harrison A re-evaluation of the 'saturated scatter' method for estimating the energy imparted to patients during diagnostic radiology examinations. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  W. Eckelman,et al.  NCRP report no. 93: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland (1987). US$15.00 , 1988 .

[7]  J. Malone,et al.  An International Intercomparison of Dose-Area Product Meters , 1992 .

[8]  W Huda,et al.  Effective dose and energy imparted in diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[9]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  P J Eifel,et al.  Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. , 1994, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[11]  P. Schonken,et al.  Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation , 1991 .

[12]  W. Kane,et al.  Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.