Feedback Channels: Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Voice Mail to E-Mail

This study compared the effects of using voice mail files sent as electronic mail (e-mail) attachments versus text-based e-mail to provide student feedback. Social Presence Theory (SPT) was used as the theoretical framework for assessing the two modes of delivering feedback. SPT would predict that voice mail would be perceived as higher than e-mail in terms of social presence. In accordance with SPT, the results indicate that voice mail was perceived to have significantly higher social presence than text-based e-mail. Both e-mail and voice mail were perceived as capable of providing a reasonably high quality of feedback. The results of this study indicate that students in the voice mail group appreciated the higher social presence of the medium, whereas students in the e-mail group appreciated receiving the text-based feedback because it could be printed and then later accessed and referenced in a non-sequential manner.

[1]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  The Effects of 10 Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Co-Operative Problem-Solving , 1974, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  W. E. Holland,et al.  Information channel/source selection as a correlate of technical uncertainty in a research and development organization , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[4]  Paul F. Finnigan.  Voice mail , 1983, AFIPS '83.

[5]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[6]  Michael Z. Hackman,et al.  Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction , 1990 .

[7]  Douglas E. Shook,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .

[8]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[9]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Asynchronous Technologies in Small Face‐to‐Face Groups , 1992 .

[10]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Fragments of Your Communication: Email, Vmail, and Fax , 1992, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[12]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[13]  Tony Bates.  Technology, open learning and distance education / Tony Bates , 1995 .

[14]  Gong-Li Xu,et al.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Using E-Mail as Instructional Aid: Some Random Thoughts. , 1996 .

[15]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  The poverty of media richness theory: explaining people's choice of electronic mail vs. voice mail , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Adrienne O'Neill.  Using Technology to Sustain Enthusiasm , 1997 .

[17]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice , 1997 .

[18]  Alistair Inglis.  Video email: a method of speeding up assignment feedback for visual arts subjects in distance education , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Martha L. Nabors.  New Functions for "Old Macs": Providing Immediate Feedback for Student Teachers through Technology , 1999 .

[20]  Hsiu-Mei Huang.  Instructional Technologies Facilitating Online Courses. , 2000 .

[21]  Ken Blake,et al.  Using the World Wide Web to Teach News Writing Online , 2000 .

[22]  J. Webster,et al.  Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use , 2000 .