Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations

Abstract Under the assumption of missing at random, eight confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference between two correlated proportions in the presence of incomplete paired binary data are constructed on the basis of the likelihood ratio statistic, the score statistic, the Wald-type statistic, the hybrid method incorporated with the Wilson score and Agresti–Coull (AC) intervals, and the Bootstrap-resampling method. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the presented CIs in terms of coverage probability and expected interval width. Our empirical results evidence that the Wilson-score-based hybrid CI and the Wald-type CI together with the constrained maximum likelihood estimates perform well for small-to-moderate sample sizes in the sense that (i) their empirical coverage probabilities are quite close to the prespecified confidence level, (ii) their expected interval widths are shorter, and (iii) their ratios of the mesial non-coverage to non-coverage probabilities lie in interval [0.4, 0.6]. An example from a neurological study is used to illustrate the proposed methodologies.

[1]  Niansheng Tang,et al.  Confidence interval construction for proportion ratio in paired studies based on hybrid method , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[2]  Myron N. Chang Estimation of Multiple Response Rates in Phase II Clinical Trials with Missing Observations , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[3]  Debajyoti Sinha,et al.  Using Bayesian p‐values in a 2 × 2 table of matched pairs with incompletely classified data , 2009, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics.

[4]  Man-Lai Tang,et al.  Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Xiaohe Zhang,et al.  A note on confidence interval estimation for a linear function of binomial proportions , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[6]  A Donner,et al.  Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: A general approach , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Niansheng Tang,et al.  Exact Tests for Comparing Two Paired Proportions with Incomplete Data , 2004 .

[8]  R G Newcombe,et al.  Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  T Tango,et al.  Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Thomson A hybrid paired and unpaired analysis for the comparison of proportions. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  S C Choi,et al.  Comparing incomplete paired binomial data under non-random mechanisms. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  T. Snijders,et al.  Testing equality of correlated proportions with incomplete data on both responses , 1986 .

[15]  G. Campbell Testing equality of proportions with incomplete correlated data , 1984 .

[16]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Practical Tests for Comparing Two Proportions with Incomplete Data , 1982 .

[17]  G. Ekbohm On testing the equality of proportions in the paired case with incomplete data , 1982 .

[18]  Sandeep Menon,et al.  Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data , 2013, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[19]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[20]  M. Chavance [Jackknife and bootstrap]. , 1992, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.