TECHNOLOGY AND SPAN OF CONTROL: WOODWARD REVISITED

This study of production operations in 95 New Jersey manufacturing firms explains the widely replicated curvilinear relationship between first line supervisory span of control and Woodward's technological complexity scale. Revisiting Woodward led to the initial proposition that the relationship was a by-product of the differing degree of task variability among the major types of production operations. A subsequent literature review of administrative requirements suggested the importance of size, complexity and automaticity on supervisory span of control. Our data indicate that variations in the span of control of production operations classified according to Woodward's scale are attributable to the underlying effects of size and task complexity. Technology, whether operationalized as Woodward's production types or automaticity of machinery explained little variation in the span of control of first line supervisors.

[1]  Koya Azumi,et al.  Determinants of Administrative Control: A Test of a Theory With Japanese Factories , 1976 .

[2]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations , 1972 .

[3]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model , 1984 .

[4]  D. Pugh.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations. , 1969 .

[5]  F. Hull,et al.  The Effect of Technology on Alienation from Work , 1982 .

[6]  S. Klatzky.  Relationship of Organizational Size to Complexity and Coordination. , 1970 .

[7]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Technology and Organization Structure: A Re-examination of the Findings of the Aston Group , 1972 .

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[9]  John H. Freeman.  Environment, Technology, and the Administrative Intensity of Manufacturing Organizations , 1973 .

[10]  D. Pugh,et al.  Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1969 .

[11]  W. Rushing,et al.  The Effects of Industry Size and Division of Labor on Administration , 1967 .

[12]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Industrial Technology and Worker Integration in the Organization , 1970 .

[13]  Gerald D. Bell.  Determinants of Span of Control , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[15]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  Woodward, Technology, Organizational Structure And Performance — A Critique Of The Universal Generalization , 1976 .

[16]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARD A NEW CONTINGENCY APPROACH: THE SEARCH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL GESTALTS , 1981 .

[17]  J. Kimberly.  Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: a review, critique, and proposal , 1976 .

[18]  J. Child.  Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study , 1972 .

[19]  John Henry Freeman,et al.  Problems of Definitional Dependency: The Case of Administrative Intensity , 1973 .

[20]  Frank M. Hull,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker's Organic Type , 1982 .

[21]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[22]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[23]  Giorgio Inzerilli,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Empirical Research on Technology and Structure , 1979 .

[24]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[25]  P. Blau,et al.  Technology and Organization in Manufacturing , 1976 .

[26]  Barry Turner,et al.  A Theory of Organization and Behavior in Batch Production Factories , 1972 .

[27]  L W Fry,et al.  Technology-structure research: three critical issues. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[28]  Theodore R. Anderson,et al.  Organizational size and functional complexity: a study of administration In hospitals , 1961 .

[29]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Defining the Span of Control. , 1974 .

[30]  Robert M. Marsh,et al.  Technology and Size as Determinants of the Organizational Structure of Japanese Factories , 1981 .

[31]  John B. Miner,et al.  Merging Management and Behavioral Theory: The Interaction Between Span of Control and Group Size , 1969 .