Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. II. Patch choice and length of working day

Summary 1. When prey occur at high densities, energy assimilation rates are generally constrained by rates of digestion rather than by rates of collection (i.e. search and handle). As predators usually select patches containing high prey densities, rates of digestion will play an important role in the foraging ecology of a species. 2. The red knot Calidris canutus shows tremendous inter- and intra-individual variation in maximum rates of digestion due to variation in the size of the processing machinery (gizzard and intestine), which makes it a suitable species to study the effects of digestive processing rate on foraging decisions. 3. Here we report on patch use, prey choice, and daily foraging times as a function of gizzard size in free-ranging, radio-marked, red knots. As knots crush their bulky bivalve prey in their gizzard, the size of this organ, which we measured using ultrasonography, determines digestive processing rate. 4. Using the digestive rate model, we a priori modelled patch use, prey choice, and daily foraging times as a function of gizzard mass. Focusing on two contrasting patches, birds with small gizzards were expected to feed on high-quality (soft-bodied) prey found in low densities in the one patch, while birds with large gizzards were expected to feed on low-quality (hard-shelled) prey found in high densities in the other patch. Assuming that red knots aim to balance their energy budget on a daily basis, we expected daily foraging time to decline with gizzard mass. 5. Observed patch and prey choices were in quantitative agreement with these theoretical predictions. Observed daily foraging times were only in qualitative agreement: they declined with gizzard mass but less steeply than predicted. 6. We discuss that red knots might be aiming for a slightly positive energy budget in order to (i) refuel their stores depleted during migration, and (ii) to insure against unpredictability in supply and demand during winter. Red knots arriving from their breeding grounds with small gizzards are only able to realize this aim when densities of soft-bodied prey are high, which is the case in late July and early August. Rapidly declining soft-bodied prey densities throughout late summer pose a major penalty for individuals arriving late at their wintering grounds. 7. The long daily foraging periods required by knots with small gizzards are only feasible through ‘tide-extension’. In our study area, birds can and do raise the daily low tide period from 12 h to almost 17 h by moving along with the tide in an easterly direction, subsequently flying back to their starting point at the high tide roost.

[1]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity: A test with fox squirrels , 1995 .

[2]  B. Ens,et al.  Why oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus cannot meet their daily energy requirements in a single low water period , 1996 .

[3]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Estimating Organ Size in Small Migrating Shorebirds with Ultrasonography: An Intercalibration Exercise , 1999, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[4]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Incompletely Informed Shorebirds That Face a Digestive Constraint Maximize Net Energy Gain When Exploiting Patches , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Close to the edge: Energetic bottlenecks and the evolution of migratory pathways in knots , 1994 .

[6]  J. M. Starck,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Adaptations to Feeding in Vertebrates , 2005 .

[7]  Spaargaren SEASONAL AND ANNUAL VARIATIONS IN THE CATCHES OF CRANGON CRANGON, (L., 1758) (DECAPODA, NATANTIA) NEAR THE COAST OF TEXEL, THE NETHERLANDS , 2000 .

[8]  H. Hirakawa Diet optimization with a nutrient or toxin constraint. , 1995, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Scale and intensity of intertidal habitat use by knots Calidris canutus in the Western Wadden Sea in relation to food, friends and foes , 1993 .

[10]  Stephanie Wray,et al.  Wildlife telemetry - remote monitoring and tracking of animals , 1992 .

[11]  P. Battley,et al.  Do body condition and plumage during fuelling predict northwards departure dates of Great Knots Calidris tenuirostris from north‐west Australia? , 2003 .

[12]  M. Klaassen Physiological flexibility and its impact on energy metabolism and foraging behaviour in birds , 1999 .

[13]  L. Zwarts,et al.  Annual and seasonal-variation in the food-supply harvestable by knot Calidris-canutus staging in the Wadden Sea in late summer , 1992 .

[14]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .

[15]  Nils Warnock,et al.  Attachment of radio-transmitters to sandpipers: review and methods , 1993 .

[16]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Long‐term indirect effects of mechanical cockle‐dredging on intertidal bivalve stocks in the Wadden Sea , 2001 .

[17]  G. Gudmundsson,et al.  Rapid Changes in the Size of Different Functional Organ and Muscle Groups during Refueling in a Long‐Distance Migrating Shorebird , 1999, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[18]  J. V. van Gils,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird II. Optimizing gizzard size in the face of seasonal demands , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  T. Piersma,et al.  Time course and reversibility of changes in the gizzards of red knots alternately eating hard and soft food. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  S. McWilliams,et al.  Digestive Constraints in Mammalian and Avian Ecology , 2004 .

[21]  T. Piersma Energetic Bottlenecks and Other Design Constraints in Avian Annual Cycles1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[22]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition , 2004 .

[23]  L. Zwarts,et al.  Why knot Calidris canutus take medium-sized Macoma balthica when six prey species are available , 1992 .

[24]  T. Piersma,et al.  Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design , 2003 .

[25]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Forage Quality and Aggregation by Large Herbivores , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Å. Lindström,et al.  Rapid reversible changes in organ size as a component of adaptive behaviour. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  J. Gils,et al.  Holling's functional response model as a tool to link the food-finding mechanism of a probing shorebird with its spatial distribution , 1995 .

[28]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Radio-telemetry observations of the first 650 km of the migration of Bar-tailed Godwits Limosa lapponica from the Wadden Sea to the Russian Arctic , 2002 .

[29]  Christine Johnson Patterns of seasonal weight variation in waders on the wash , 1985 .

[30]  L. Zwarts,et al.  How the food supply harvestable by waders in the Wadden Sea depends on the variation in energy density, body weight, biomass, burying depth and behaviour of tidal-flat invertebrates , 1993 .

[31]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  University of Groningen INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STOMACH STRUCTURE AND DIET CHOICE IN SHOREBIRDS , 2008 .

[32]  G. Visser,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of mollusc eating in a shorebird I. Foraging and processing costs estimated by the doubly labelled water method , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  E. Charnov Optimal Foraging: Attack Strategy of a Mantid , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[34]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[35]  Yuri Zharikov,et al.  Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry , Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Nonbreeding Eastern Curlews Numenius madagascariensis Do Not Increase the Rate of Intake or Digestive Efficiency before Long ‐ Distance Migration because of an Apparent Digestive Constraint , 2003 .

[36]  H. Kokko Competition for early arrival in migratory birds , 1999 .

[37]  Joost M. Tinbergen,et al.  Foraging Decisions in Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.) , 1981 .

[38]  Å. Lindström,et al.  Gluttony in migratory waders: unprecedented energy assimilation rates in vertebrates , 2003 .

[39]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the Theory of Optimal Diets , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[40]  P. Battley,et al.  Adaptive interplay between feeding ecology and features of the digestive tract in birds , 2005 .

[41]  J. Alonso,et al.  Modelling state-dependent interference in common cranes , 2002 .

[42]  W. Karasov,et al.  Digestive Response to Restricted Feeding in Migratory Yellow‐Rumped Warblers , 2002, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[43]  M. Kersten The rate of food processing in the Oystercatcher: Food intake and energy expenditure constrained by a digestive bottleneck , 1996 .

[44]  T. Schoener Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[45]  P. Wiersma,et al.  Variability in Basal Metabolic Rate of a Long-Distance Migrant Shorebird (Red Knot, Calidris canutus) Reflects Shifts in Organ Sizes , 1996, Physiological Zoology.

[46]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules , 2003 .

[47]  Han Olff,et al.  Herbivores Between Plants and Predators , 1999 .

[48]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice , 2005 .

[49]  S. Nebel,et al.  Length of stopover, fuel storage and a sex-bias in the occurrence of red knots Calidris c. canutus and C-c. islandica in the Wadden Sea during southward migration , 2000 .

[50]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Reconstructing diet composition on the basis of faeces in a mollusc-eating wader, the Knot Calidris canutus , 1993 .