Learning to Explain Astronomy Across Moving Frames of Reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts

Learning astronomy involves significant spatial reasoning, such as learning to describe Earth-based phenomena and understanding space-based explanations for those phenomena as well as using the relevant size and scale information to interpret these frames of reference. This study examines daily celestial motion (DCM) as one case of how children learn to move between frames of reference in astronomy wherein one explains Earth-based descriptions of the Sun's, Moon's, and stars' apparent motion using the Earth's daily rotation. We analysed interviews with 8–9-year-old students (N = 99) who participated in one of four instructional conditions emphasizing: the space-based perspective; the Earth-based perspective in the planetarium; constructing explanations for the Earth-based observations; and a combination of the planetarium plus constructing explanations in the classroom. We used an embodied cognition framework to analyse outcomes while also considering challenges learners face due to the high cognitive demands of spatial reasoning. Results support the hypothesis that instruction should engage students in learning both the Earth-based observations and space-based explanations, as focusing on a single frame of reference resulted in less sophisticated explanations; however, few students were able to construct a fully scientific explanation after instruction.

[1]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .

[2]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Early Education for Spatial Intelligence: Why, What, and How , 2010 .

[3]  J. Mathewson.  Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[4]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Children's Early Ability to Solve Perspective-Taking Problems. , 1992 .

[5]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[6]  J. Ramadas,et al.  Designed and Spontaneous Gestures in Elementary Astronomy Education , 2011 .

[7]  S. Vosniadou.  ‘Conceptual Metaphor Meets Conceptual Change’: Yes to Embodiment, No to Fragmentation , 2009, Human Development.

[8]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Stacy B. Ehrlich,et al.  The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[10]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[11]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  11 Mental models of spatial relations and transformations from language , 1999 .

[12]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Children Learning to Explain Daily Celestial Motion: Understanding astronomy across moving frames of reference , 2011 .

[13]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[14]  A. Albanese,et al.  Models in Science and in Education: A Critical Review of Research on Students' Ideas About the Earth and its Place in the Universe , 1997 .

[15]  J. Plummer.  Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium , 2009 .

[16]  T. Mueller.  Learning to Think Spatially , 2006 .

[17]  D. Uttal,et al.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  J. Confrey,et al.  Justifying Alternative Models in Learning Astronomy: A study of K–8 science teachers’ understanding of frames of reference , 2010 .

[19]  Stanley B Klein,et al.  What memory is. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[20]  J. Sweller.  Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[21]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill , 2005, Psychological science.

[22]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[23]  John E. Christopher,et al.  The Effect of Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Middle School Students’ Understanding of Lunar Concepts , 2010 .

[24]  M. Hegarty.  Components of Spatial Intelligence , 2010 .

[25]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Conceptualizing Magnification and Scale: The Roles of Spatial Visualization and Logical Thinking , 2011 .

[26]  E. Blown,et al.  Conceptual Coherence Revealed in Multi‐Modal Representations of Astronomy Knowledge , 2010 .

[27]  Elaine M. Crowder.  Gestures at Work in Sense-Making Science Talk , 1996 .

[28]  Mesut Saçkes,et al.  Using a Planetarium Software Program to Promote Conceptual Change with Young Children , 2010 .

[29]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Learning what children know about space from looking at their hands: the added value of gesture in spatial communication. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Alice A. Black.  Spatial Ability and Earth Science Conceptual Understanding , 2005 .

[31]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Culture and children's cosmology. , 2004, Developmental science.

[32]  Juanita V. Copley,et al.  The Development of Spatial Skills Through Interventions Involving Block Building Activities , 2008 .

[33]  Joan Parker,et al.  The earth and beyond: developing primary teachers' understanding of basic astronomical events , 1998 .

[34]  M. Brooks,et al.  Drawing, Visualisation and Young Children’s Exploration of “Big Ideas” , 2009 .

[35]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  ESTABLISHING THE EMPIRICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NON-SCIENCE MAJORING UNDERGRADUATE LEARNERS' SPATIAL THINKING SKILLS AND THEIR CONCEPTUAL ASTRONOMY KNOWLEDGE , 2012 .

[36]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Addressing children's alternative frameworks of the Moon's phases and eclipses , 2002 .

[37]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  A Cross‐age Study of Children’s Knowledge of Apparent Celestial Motion , 2009 .

[38]  K. Holyoak.  Mental representations. , 1982, Science.

[39]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[40]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[41]  J. Wilhelm.  Gender Differences in Lunar‐related Scientific and Mathematical Understandings , 2009 .

[42]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition: Spatial Cognition , 2008 .

[44]  M. Kallery.  Astronomical Concepts and Events Awareness for Young Children , 2011 .

[45]  R. Roberts,et al.  Developmental differences in giving directions: spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. , 1993, Child development.

[46]  S. Sorby.  Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students , 2009 .

[47]  R. Rigal,et al.  Right-Left Orientation, Mental Rotation, and Perspective-Taking: When Can Children Imagine What People See from Their Own Viewpoint? , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[48]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[49]  W. Firestone.  Alternative Arguments for Generalizing From Data as Applied to Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[50]  Mark Johnson,et al.  The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[52]  Kathy Cabe Trundle,et al.  Fourth‐grade Elementary Students’ Conceptions of Standards‐based Lunar Concepts , 2007 .

[53]  D. Uttal,et al.  Spatial Thinking and STEM Education. When, Why, and How? , 2012 .

[54]  Shamin Padalkar,et al.  Visualisation and Reasoning in Explaining the Phases of the Moon , 2009 .

[55]  N. Newcombe.  Picture This: Increasing Math and Science Learning by Improving Spatial Thinking. , 2010 .