Mechanical properties of the superficial biofilm layer determine the architecture of biofilms.

Cells in biofilms sense and interact with their environment through the extracellular matrix. The physicochemical properties of the matrix, particularly at the biofilm-environment interface, determine how cells respond to changing conditions. In this study we describe the application of atomic force microscopy and confocal imaging to probe in situ the mechanical properties of these interfacial regions and to elucidate how key matrix components can contribute to the physical sensing by the cells. We describe how the Young's modulus of microcolonies differs according to the size and morphology of microcolonies, as well as the flow rate. The Young's modulus increased as a function of microcolony diameter, which was correlated with the production of the polysaccharide Psl at later stages of maturation for hemispherical or mushroom shaped microcolonies. The Young's modulus of the periphery of the biofilm colony was however independent of the hydrodynamic shear. The morphology of the microcolonies also influenced interfacial or peripheral stiffness. Microcolonies with a diffuse morphology had a lower Young's modulus than isolated, circular ones and this phenomenon was due to a deficiency of Psl. In this way, changes in the specific polysaccharide components imbue the biofilm with distinct physical properties that may modulate the way in which bacteria perceive or respond to their environment. Further, the physical properties of the polysaccharides are closely linked to the specific architectures formed by the developing biofilm.

[1]  J. Younger,et al.  Flexible microfluidic device for mechanical property characterization of soft viscoelastic solids such as bacterial biofilms. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  Bernard Nysten,et al.  Nanoscale mapping of the elasticity of microbial cells by atomic force microscopy , 2003 .

[3]  Hiroshi Murata,et al.  Rheology - Theory and Application to Biomaterials , 2012 .

[4]  Alojz Ivankovic,et al.  Mechanical properties of a mature biofilm from a wastewater system: from microscale to macroscale level , 2015, Biofouling.

[5]  A. Spormann,et al.  Dynamics and Control of Biofilms of the Oligotrophic Bacterium Caulobacter crescentus , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of a Mixed Culture Biofilm from Rheometer Creep Analysis , 2003, Biofouling.

[7]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  Hans-Curt Flemming,et al.  The EPS Matrix: The “House of Biofilm Cells” , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  B. V. Derjaguin,et al.  Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles , 1975 .

[10]  T. Camesano,et al.  Role of ionic strength on the relationship of biopolymer conformation, DLVO contributions, and steric interactions to bioadhesion of Pseudomonas putida KT2442. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[11]  M. Parsek,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa recognizes and responds aggressively to the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. , 2009, Microbiology.

[12]  Hans C. Gerritsen,et al.  Depth Penetration and Detection of pH Gradients in Biofilms by Two-Photon Excitation Microscopy , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Microrheology : Rheology and rheological techniques , 1999 .

[14]  J. Dutcher,et al.  In Situ Characterization of Differences in the Viscoelastic Response of Individual Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Cells , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Patrick S Doyle,et al.  Bar-coded hydrogel microparticles for protein detection: synthesis, assay and scanning , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[16]  H. Flemming,et al.  The biofilm matrix , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  Leonid Pavlovsky,et al.  In situ rheology of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms. , 2013, Soft matter.

[18]  D. Otzen,et al.  Functional Amyloids Keep Quorum-sensing Molecules in Check* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  B. Logan,et al.  Probing Bacterial Electrosteric Interactions Using Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[20]  Nelly Henry,et al.  Mapping of bacterial biofilm local mechanics by magnetic microparticle actuation. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Jie Yan,et al.  Effect of YOYO-1 on the mechanical properties of DNA. , 2014, Soft matter.

[22]  Markus Böl,et al.  Recent advances in mechanical characterisation of biofilm and their significance for material modelling , 2013, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[23]  M. Parsek,et al.  A spider web strategy of type IV pili-mediated migration to build a fibre-like Psl polysaccharide matrix in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. , 2013, Environmental microbiology.

[24]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[25]  P. Watnick,et al.  Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms , 2009, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[26]  Jost Wingender,et al.  Rheological properties of viscoelastic biofilm extracellular polymeric substances and comparison to the behavior of calcium alginate gels , 2004 .

[27]  O. Nybroe,et al.  A panel of Tn7-based vectors for insertion of the gfp marker gene or for delivery of cloned DNA into Gram-negative bacteria at a neutral chromosomal site. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[28]  E. Dague,et al.  Surface Structure and Nanomechanical Properties of Shewanella putrefaciens Bacteria at Two pH values (4 and 10) Determined by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  Melanie J. Brown,et al.  Role of bacterial extracellular polymers in metal uptake in pure bacterial culture and activated sludge—II Effects of mean cell retention time , 1982 .

[30]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  Danial Taherzadeh,et al.  Computational study of the drag and oscillatory movement of biofilm streamers in fast flows , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  C. F. van der Walle,et al.  Microrheology of bacterial biofilms in vitro: Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[33]  Z Lewandowski,et al.  Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  Mechanical properties and failure of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, studied using a microindentation device. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[35]  I. Hay,et al.  Role of Exopolysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation and Architecture , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  V. Körstgens,et al.  Uniaxial compression measurement device for investigation of the mechanical stability of biofilms. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[37]  Patrick S Doyle,et al.  Material properties of biofilms—a review of methods for understanding permeability and mechanics , 2015, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[38]  S. Molin,et al.  Distinct roles of extracellular polymeric substances in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[39]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  Metabolic codependence gives rise to collective oscillations within biofilms , 2015, Nature.

[40]  Zhe Xu,et al.  Nanoindentation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial biofilm using atomic force microscopy , 2014 .

[41]  Matthew R. Parsek,et al.  Assembly and Development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Matrix , 2009, PLoS pathogens.

[42]  Elizabeth Nance,et al.  Single particle tracking reveals spatial and dynamic organization of the Escherichia coli biofilm matrix , 2014 .

[43]  R. Hozalski,et al.  Development and testing of a novel microcantilever technique for measuring the cohesive strength of intact biofilms , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[44]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods , 2002 .

[45]  Y. Oh,et al.  Effects of substrates on biofilm formation observed by atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Ultramicroscopy.

[46]  S. Molin,et al.  Polysaccharides serve as scaffold of biofilms formed by mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2012, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[47]  Variation in the mechanical properties of a porous multi-phase biofilm under compression due to void closure. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[48]  C. Haisch,et al.  Investigation of the mesoscale structure and volumetric features of biofilms using optical coherence tomography , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[49]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges , 2015, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[50]  Zhibing Zhang,et al.  Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[51]  Knut Drescher,et al.  Extracellular matrix structure governs invasion resistance in bacterial biofilms , 2015, The ISME Journal.

[52]  Enrique A. López-Guerra,et al.  Modeling viscoelasticity through spring–dashpot models in intermittent-contact atomic force microscopy , 2014, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[53]  Yves F Dufrêne,et al.  Atomic force microscopy of microbial cells: application to nanomechanical properties, surface forces and molecular recognition forces. , 2007, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[54]  C. Wright,et al.  Application of AFM from microbial cell to biofilm. , 2010, Scanning.

[55]  J. Dutcher,et al.  Absolute quantitation of bacterial biofilm adhesion and viscoelasticity by microbead force spectroscopy. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[56]  P Stoodley,et al.  The influence of fluid shear and AICI3 on the material properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Desulfovibrio sp. EX265 biofilms. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[57]  P. Stewart,et al.  Chemical and antimicrobial treatments change the viscoelastic properties of bacterial biofilms , 2011, Biofouling.

[58]  R. Hozalski,et al.  Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[59]  A. Kharazmi,et al.  The Immune Response to Bacterial Biofilms , 1995 .

[60]  Paige J. Novak,et al.  Biofilm Cohesiveness Measurement Using a Novel Atomic Force Microscopy Methodology , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[61]  Aaron P. Mosier,et al.  A novel microfluidic device for the in situ optical and mechanical analysis of bacterial biofilms. , 2012, Journal of microbiological methods.

[62]  S. Rice,et al.  Genetic and chemical tools for investigating signaling processes in biofilms. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[63]  J. Younger,et al.  Artificial biofilms establish the role of matrix interactions in staphylococcal biofilm assembly and disassembly , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[64]  Manfred H. Jericho,et al.  Atomic force microscopy and theoretical considerations of surface properties and turgor pressures of bacteria , 2002 .