Living with predators: a focus on the issues of human–crocodile conflict within the lower Zambezi valley

Context Human–wildlife conflict is a global problem and increasing worldwide as people and wildlife compete for limited resources. Conflict between people and crocodiles, especially in Africa, is recognised as a serious problem. The people of the Chiawa Game Management Area are heavily dependent on the Zambezi River for several resources from potable water and irrigating fields to a source of food (subsistence and small-scale commercial fishing). Aims To assess the spatial and temporal scale of human–crocodile conflict (HCC) and identify associated factors, with a view to recommending mitigation measures. Methods A questionnaire survey and Zambia Wildlife Authority data were utilised to estimate the scale of HCC. Key results Between 2000 and 2009, there were 98 crocodile attacks on people, 62.2% were fatal. Most of the attacks occurred while canoe fishing (57.1%) and collecting water (29.6%). Crocodiles were disliked and seen as a ‘problem’ by the majority of the populace. Even though crocodiles are a charismatic mega-fauna species, being employed within the tourism industry had only a minor positive effect on people’s attitudes. The area is an important location for crocodile egg and adult harvesting, although the local population gains no financial benefit. An increase in the number of boreholes in the villages was suggested by the local people as the primary mitigation measure, as well as the removal of crocodiles by various means. Conclusions Although people displayed an understanding of the risks of crocodile attack, very few actually employed mitigation techniques or utilised protective barriers when at the river. Increased water-access points (and their maintenance) in the villages would reduce people’s dependency on the river. The negative attitude towards crocodiles is an issue that has to be addressed to allow successful implementation of long-term conservation strategies. Implications Understanding local people’s attitudes towards wildlife is an important aspect within any conservation management plan. Competition for limited resources by people and wildlife is guaranteed to cause confrontations. The existing mitigation for human crocodile conflict in Zambia is ineffective. The negative attitude towards wildlife needs to be addressed and a suitable response formulated. The most favoured type of mitigation suggested by local people was more boreholes and the removal of crocodiles. Photograph by Kevin Wallace.

[1]  A. Dickman,et al.  Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict , 2010 .

[2]  H. B. Cott,et al.  Scientific results of an inquiry into the ecology and economic status of the Nile Crocodile (Crocodilus niloticus) in Uganda and Northern Rhodesia , 1962 .

[3]  F. Urbano,et al.  Human–wildlife conflict in Mozambique: a national perspective, with emphasis on wildlife attacks on humans , 2010, Oryx.

[4]  D. Brockington,et al.  The work of conservation organisations in sub-Saharan Africa* , 2010, The Journal of Modern African Studies.

[5]  F. Mazzotti,et al.  Alligators and crocodiles as indicators for restoration of Everglades ecosystems , 2009 .

[6]  J. Broderick,et al.  A Tool Box Half Full: How Social Science can Help Solve Human–Wildlife Conflict , 2009 .

[7]  T. Coulson,et al.  The Impact of Nile Crocodiles on Rural Livelihoods in Northeastern Namibia , 2009 .

[8]  G. Wolters,et al.  Eyewitness Memory of a Supermarket Robbery: A Case Study of Accuracy and Confidence After 3 Months , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[9]  S. Harris,et al.  Conservation on community lands: the importance of equitable revenue sharing , 2008, Environmental Conservation.

[10]  A. Stronza,et al.  Ecotourism and Conservation: Two Cases from Brazil and Peru , 2008 .

[11]  P. Frost,et al.  The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services , 2008 .

[12]  S. Romañach,et al.  Determinants of attitudes towards predators in central Kenya and suggestions for increasing tolerance in livestock dominated landscapes , 2007, Oryx.

[13]  Mike Letnic,et al.  Changes in the distribution and abundance of saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) in the upstream, freshwater reaches of rivers in the Northern Territory, Australia , 2006 .

[14]  R. Wallace,et al.  Co-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts: A Review , 2006 .

[15]  G. Webb,et al.  Crocodile Attack in Australia: An Analysis of Its Incidence and Review of the Pathology and Management of Crocodilian Attacks in General , 2005, Wilderness & environmental medicine.

[16]  J. Mcgregor Crocodile Crimes: People Versus Wildlife and the Politics of Postcolonial Conservation on Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe , 2005 .

[17]  M. Manfredo,et al.  Concepts for Exploring the Social Aspects of Human–Wildlife Conflict in a Global Context , 2004 .

[18]  F. Madden Creating Coexistence between Humans and Wildlife: Global Perspectives on Local Efforts to Address Human–Wildlife Conflict , 2004 .

[19]  David J. Mladenoff,et al.  Predicting Human‐Carnivore Conflict: a Spatial Model Derived from 25 Years of Data on Wolf Predation on Livestock , 2004 .

[20]  B. Proponent CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II , 2004 .

[21]  M. Willgerodt Using Focus Groups to Develop Culturally Relevant Instruments , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.

[22]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature , 2002, Science.

[23]  H. Zinn,et al.  Values, Gender, and Concern about Potentially Dangerous Wildlife , 2002 .

[24]  Darren L. Frechette,et al.  Gatornomics: Profitable and Sustainable Use of Alligators in the Southeastern United States , 2001, Marine Resource Economics.

[25]  M. Infield,et al.  Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda , 2001, Oryx.

[26]  R. A. Luxmoore,et al.  Directory of crocodilian farming operations , 1992 .