Interaction in Open Distance Learning: Research Issues in Malaysia

Open Distance Learning (ODL) is an excellent method of reaching adult learners. It is truly a medium that helps to democratise education to all. Certainly in Malaysia, with the mushrooming of many dual mode institutions that offer ODL and the establishment of the Open University Malaysia (OUM) and other private institutions that offer ODL courses, education is being made accessible to all. For many Malaysians, pursuing ODL is just a matter of choice. With the competing priorities of work, home and school, adult learners desire a high degree of flexibility. The structure of ODL provides learners with the greatest possible control over the time, place and pace of education; however, learning at a distance is not without problems. Loss of student motivation due to the lack of face-to-face contact with teachers and peers, potentially high start up costs and lack of faculty support are all barriers to successful ODL. One particular important instructional element of contemporary ODL is interaction. It is a widely held belief that a high level of interaction is desirable and positively affects the effectiveness of any ODL course. However, it is not clear from research or evaluation data if interaction does improve the quality of learning in most ODL programmes. Furthermore, based on literature review, it is evident that little attention has been paid to the cost/benefits of interaction in terms of preparation time versus instructional effects. This article examines the research issues of interactivity in ODL in Malaysia.

[1]  G. Rumble Student support in distance education in the 21st century: Learning from service management , 2000 .

[2]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[3]  Patricia L. Smith,et al.  Comparing Distance Learning and Classroom Learning: Conceptual Considerations. , 1999 .

[4]  Edward L. Meyen,et al.  Developing Online Instruction , 1997 .

[5]  Larry Lapide Benchmarking Best Practices , 2005 .

[6]  C. C. Gibson Distance learners in higher education : institutional responses for quality outcomes , 1998 .

[7]  Brent Heslop,et al.  Elements of E-Mail Style: Communicate Effectively via Electronic Mail , 1994 .

[8]  A. Kenny Online learning: enhancing nurse education? , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[10]  Lawrence A. Beard,et al.  Student Perceptions of Online versus on Campus Instruction , 2002 .

[11]  T. Cyrs,et al.  Teaching and learning at a distance : what it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs , 1997 .

[12]  Lorraine Sherry,et al.  Issues in Distance Learning , 1995 .

[13]  E. Wagner Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes. , 1997 .

[14]  Terry Henner Bridging the Distance , 2002, Medical reference services quarterly.

[15]  C. Fulford,et al.  Perceptions of Interaction: The critical predictor in distance education , 1993 .

[16]  Robert H. Lochte Interactive Television and Instruction: A Guide to Technology, Technique, Facilities Design, and Classroom Management , 1994 .

[17]  Alan Tait,et al.  Planning Student Support for Open and Distance Learning , 2000 .

[18]  K. Spann Benchmarking: best practices. , 1997, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[19]  Dzakiria Hisham "The Teacher is Always There, but Isn't...". Distance Learners' Experiences and Perspectives on Distance Learning at Universiti Utara Malaysia. , 2004 .

[20]  Mikiko Ward Crawford Students' perceptions of the interpersonal communication courses offered through distance education at Ohio University , 1999 .

[21]  D J Skiba,et al.  Benchmarking Best Practices in Web-Based Nursing Courses , 2001, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[22]  Ned A. Flanders,et al.  Analyzing Teaching Behavior , 1970 .

[23]  K. Wambach,et al.  Interaction in graduate nursing Web-based instruction. , 2001, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[24]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  Interactive Multimedia Instruction , 1993 .

[25]  Hisham Dzakiria,et al.  Teacher- Learner Interactions in Distance Education: A Case of Two Malaysian Universities , 2003 .

[26]  Brent Muirhead Interactivity Research Studies , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[27]  Ormond Simpson,et al.  Supporting Students in Online, Open and Distance Learning , 2000 .

[28]  Keng-Soon Soo,et al.  Interaction: What Does It Mean in Online Distance Education?. , 1998 .

[29]  John V. Dempsey,et al.  Interactive Instruction and Feedback , 1993 .