Investigations on the structural behaviour of archaeological heritage in Peru: From survey to seismic assessment

The conservation of archaeological heritage is of major importance for preserving the scientific, ethnographic and artistic values of past cultures. Once archaeological sites are exposed after being buried for centuries, they are subjected to natural hazards, which should be studied with up-to-date techniques. Moreover, conservation works are primarily focused on aesthetic aspects or on solving localized problems. In earthquake-prone areas, it is of extreme importance to carry out structural analysis studies for assessing the actual behaviour of archaeological constructions, and for proposing adequate intervention measures. This paper presents an extensive study on structural behaviour of archaeological building remains in Peru, based on in-situ non-destructive testing as well as on numerical approaches. The case of the Chokepukio Archaeological Site is presented, which was built between 1000 and 1450 AD in the Pre-Columbian era, with a mixed masonry of stone units and earthen mortar. The paper begins with a comprehensive description of the historical, architectural and structural aspects of the archaeological site. The possibility of applying operational modal analysis tests is then explored with reference to a representative wall of Chokepukio. The results of the experimental field campaign are used to develop calibrated finite element models of the wall, and to indirectly estimate mechanical characteristics of the masonry. Basing on the investigations performed, potential failure mechanisms are identified for the wall and validated by pushover analysis. Finally, the mechanisms are evaluated through kinematic limit analysis, to proceed with the seismic assessment.

[1]  Lukas Furst,et al.  The Stone Skeleton Structural Engineering Of Masonry Architecture , 2016 .

[2]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Computations on historic masonry structures , 2002 .

[3]  Miguel Cervera,et al.  Structural Analysis of Masonry Historical Constructions. Classical and Advanced Approaches , 2010 .

[4]  Luís F. Ramos,et al.  Dynamic Identification and Modal Updating of S.Torcato Church , 2009 .

[5]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Dynamic structural health monitoring of Saint Torcato church , 2013 .

[6]  Luca Pelà,et al.  Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges , 2009 .

[7]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Robust output-only modal identification and monitoring of buildings in the presence of dynamic interactions for rapid post-earthquake emergency management , 2012 .

[8]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering Structures: An Introduction and Guide for Applications , 2014 .

[9]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Study of the Seismic Behavior of the “Old Municipal Chambers” Building in Christchurch, New Zealand , 2013 .

[10]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[11]  Luís F. Ramos,et al.  Damage identification on masonry structures based on vibration signatures , 2007 .

[12]  M. Tohidi,et al.  Seismic analysis of the Roman Temple of Évora, Portugal , 2012 .

[13]  Carmelo Gentile,et al.  Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry towers for structural identification and damage assessment , 2007 .

[14]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra , 1999 .

[15]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .

[16]  Miha Tomazevic,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings , 1999 .

[17]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  The Fossanova Church: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment by Numeric and Physical Testing , 2010 .

[18]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge , 2011 .

[19]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of out‐of‐plane masonry façades: full dynamic versus pushover methods by rigid body and spring model , 2013 .

[20]  XiaYong,et al.  Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating , 2001 .

[21]  Andreas Johann Felber,et al.  Development of a hybrid bridge evaluation system , 1994 .

[22]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Recommendations for restoration of ancient buildings and the survival of a masonry chimney , 2006 .

[23]  Y Nakamura,et al.  A METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATION OF SUBSURFACE USING MICROTREMOR ON THE GROUND SURFACE , 1989 .

[24]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Earthquake design and assessment of masonry structures : review and applications , 2009 .

[25]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  Identification of Shear Parameters of Masonry Panels Through the In-Situ Diagonal Compression Test , 2008 .

[26]  P. Welch.  The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[27]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[28]  Hong Hao,et al.  Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating: methodology and case studies , 2001 .

[29]  Walter Salvatore,et al.  Evaluation of seismic vulnerability of a complex RC existing building by linear and nonlinear modeling approaches , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[30]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Why Output Only Modal Analysis is a Desirable Tool for a Wide Range of Practical Applications , 2003 .

[31]  S. Stiros.  Archaeological evidence of antiseismic constructions in antiquity , 1995 .

[32]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Why Output-Only Modal Testing is a Desirable Tool for a Wide Range of Practical Applications , 2002 .

[33]  Alejandro Trujillo,et al.  Seismic performance of the St. George of the Latins church: Lessons learned from studying masonry ruins , 2012 .

[34]  Walter Salvatore,et al.  Evaluation of Seismic Vulnerability of Santa Maria del Mar in Barcelona by an Integrated Approach Based on Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Finite Element Modeling , 2014 .

[35]  César Chácara,et al.  ON-SITE INVESTIGATION AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX OF HUACA DE LA LUNA , 2014 .

[36]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Damage analysis of a steel–concrete composite frame by finite element model updating , 2010 .

[37]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Non-destructive characterization and dynamic identification of a modern heritage building for serviceability seismic analyses , 2013 .

[38]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Recent advances in masonry modelling : micromodelling and homogenisation , 2008 .

[39]  Nelson Lam,et al.  Displacement‐based seismic analysis for out‐of‐plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls , 2002 .

[40]  Claudio Modena,et al.  Seismic Assessment of Complex Historical Buildings: Application to Reggio Emilia Cathedral, Italy , 2008 .

[41]  Paulina Faria,et al.  Experimental Research on Rubble Stone Masonry Walls , 2008 .

[42]  Bruce M. Douglas,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTS AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION OF BRIDGES , 1982 .

[43]  Simona Voto,et al.  Historical, Architectural, and Structural Assessment of the Bell Tower of Santa Maria Del Carmine , 2009 .

[44]  Aftab A. Mufti,et al.  Damping mechanisms and damping ratios in vibrating unreinforced stone masonry , 2010 .