The clock and wavefront model revisited.

The currently accepted interpretation of the clock and wavefront model of somitogenesis is that a posteriorly moving molecular gradient sequentially slows the rate of clock oscillations, resulting in a spatial readout of temporal oscillations. However, while molecular components of the clocks and wavefronts have now been identified in the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM), there is not yet conclusive evidence demonstrating that the observed molecular wavefronts act to slow clock oscillations. Here we present an alternative formulation of the clock and wavefront model in which oscillator coupling, already known to play a key role in oscillator synchronisation, plays a fundamentally important role in the slowing of oscillations along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis. Our model has three parameters which can be determined, in any given species, by the measurement of three quantities: the clock period in the posterior PSM, somite length and the length of the PSM. A travelling wavefront, which slows oscillations along the AP axis, is an emergent feature of the model. Using the model we predict: (a) the distance between moving stripes of gene expression; (b) the number of moving stripes of gene expression and (c) the oscillator period profile along the AP axis. Predictions regarding the stripe data are verified using existing zebrafish data. We simulate a range of experimental perturbations and demonstrate how the model can be used to unambiguously define a reference frame along the AP axis. Comparing data from zebrafish, chick, mouse and snake, we demonstrate that: (a) variation in patterning profiles is accounted for by a single nondimensional parameter; the ratio of coupling strengths; and (b) the period profile along the AP axis is conserved across species. Thus the model is consistent with the idea that, although the genes involved in pattern propagation in the PSM vary, there is a conserved patterning mechanism across species.

[1]  Albert Cardona,et al.  Dynamics of zebrafish somitogenesis , 2008, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[2]  Jie Chen,et al.  A Complex Oscillating Network of Signaling Genes Underlies the Mouse Segmentation Clock , 2006, Science.

[3]  Shigeru Kondo,et al.  Noise-resistant and synchronized oscillation of the segmentation clock , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Julian Lewis Autoinhibition with Transcriptional Delay A Simple Mechanism for the Zebrafish Somitogenesis Oscillator , 2003, Current Biology.

[5]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  Control of segment number in vertebrate embryos , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Yoshihiro Morishita,et al.  Random cell movement promotes synchronization of the segmentation clock , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Oates,et al.  Segment Number and Axial Identity in a Segmentation Clock Period Mutant , 2010, Current Biology.

[8]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  Segmental patterning of the vertebrate embryonic axis , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Intercellular Coupling Regulates the Period of the Segmentation Clock , 2010, Current Biology.

[10]  Julian Lewis,et al.  Setting the Tempo in Development: An Investigation of the Zebrafish Somite Clock Mechanism , 2007, PLoS biology.

[11]  William E. Schiesser,et al.  Linear and nonlinear waves , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[12]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation , 2001, Cell.

[13]  N. Monk Oscillatory Expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-κB Driven by Transcriptional Time Delays , 2003, Current Biology.

[14]  E. C. Zeeman,et al.  A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Ruth E Baker,et al.  Mathematical models for somite formation. , 2008, Current topics in developmental biology.

[16]  O. Pourquié,et al.  Developmental control of segment numbers in vertebrates. , 2009, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[17]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Delayed coupling theory of vertebrate segmentation , 2008, HFSP journal.

[18]  Julian Lewis,et al.  Notch Signalling Synchronizes the Zebrafish Segmentation Clock but Is Not Needed To Create Somite Boundaries , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[19]  Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse,et al.  Synchrony Dynamics During Initiation, Failure, and Rescue of the Segmentation Clock , 2007, Science.

[20]  Wolfgang Wurst,et al.  Cell-based simulation of dynamic expression patterns in the presomitic mesoderm. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Paul C. Du Chateau,et al.  Applied Partial Differential Equations , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[22]  David Ish-Horowicz,et al.  Notch signalling and the synchronization of the somite segmentation clock , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Rhythms and turbulence in populations of chemical oscillators , 1981 .

[24]  J. Kim Dale,et al.  Interfering with Wnt signalling alters the periodicity of the segmentation clock , 2009, Developmental biology.