FlexMM: A standard method for material descriptions in FEM

Abstract This article discusses a number of key issues concerning simulation-based digital twins in the domain of multistage processes. Almost all production processes are multistage in nature, and so most digital twins involve multiple physical phenomena, process steps and different solvers for the simulations. Good interoperability between model solvers and processes are key to achieving a functional digital twin. Passing information between steps can be challenging, complex and time consuming, especially for material data, because the constitutive model interacts with the full modeling environment: material behavior is interdependent with the history of the process, the solver subroutines and the boundary conditions. This work proposes a flexible yet robust standardization approach, called FlexMM, for dealing with material data, constitutive models, measurement data or mathematical models to overcome part of the abovementioned complexity. The implementation of FlexMM consists of a general rule structure in which constitutive behavior is described, as well as its interaction with the subroutines used by the finite element solver. The definition of the constitutive model is stored in a separate file, in which the material behavior can be described in a user selected format, such as look-up tables, standard statistical models, machine learning or analytical expressions. After a calculation step, the new local material properties are mapped to a file to facilitate the next history-dependent step. In this way, the interaction between the different fabrication steps and processes can be incorporated. A material/process case study is presented to demonstrate the flexibility and robustness of FlexMM.

[1]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  All-hexahedral remeshing for the finite element analysis of metal forming processes , 2007 .

[2]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production , 2017 .

[3]  J. Bray,et al.  Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme , 2004 .

[4]  Ray Y. Zhong,et al.  Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review , 2017 .

[5]  Martin Baker,et al.  How to get meaningful and correct results from your finite element model , 2018, 1811.05753.

[6]  David Dureisseix,et al.  Information transfer between incompatible finite element meshes: Application to coupled thermo-viscoelasticity , 2006 .

[7]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  The MATLAB ODE Suite , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[8]  Anne M Grillet,et al.  Numerical analysis of flow mark surface defects in injection molding flow , 2002 .

[9]  K. Wang,et al.  Intelligent Predictive Maintenance ( IPdM ) System – Industry 4.0 Scenario , 2016 .

[11]  J. S. Zuback,et al.  Building blocks for a digital twin of additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[12]  Svetan M. Ratchev,et al.  An in-core grid index for transferring finite element data across dissimilar meshes , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[13]  R. Ahrem,et al.  Multidisciplinary Simulations with the Coupling Library MpCCI , 2002 .

[14]  Meng Zhang,et al.  Digital Twin Shop-Floor: A New Shop-Floor Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing , 2017, IEEE Access.

[15]  Soheil Solhjoo,et al.  Analysis of flow stress up to the peak at hot deformation , 2009 .

[16]  C. Obbink-Huizer Computational analysis of cell orientation in response to mechanical stimuli : implications for myocardial repair strategies , 2014 .

[17]  Alvaro L. G. A. Coutinho,et al.  Control strategies for timestep selection in finite element simulation of incompressible flows and coupled reaction–convection–diffusion processes , 2005 .

[18]  L. Shampine,et al.  A 3(2) pair of Runge - Kutta formulas , 1989 .

[19]  Thermophysical properties of molten tungsten measured with an electrostatic levitator , 2006 .

[20]  S. Solhjoo,et al.  Two phenomenological models to predict the single peak flow stress curves up to the peak during hot deformation , 2017 .

[21]  R. D. Krieg,et al.  Accuracies of Numerical Solution Methods for the Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Model , 1977 .

[22]  A. Meyer,et al.  A Comparison of Mapping Algorithms for Hierarchical Adaptive FEM in Finite Elasto-Plasticity , 2007 .

[23]  Guoqun Zhao,et al.  Solution of non-linear thermal transient problems by a new adaptive time-step method in quenching process , 2009 .

[24]  S. Solhjoo Determination of flow stress and the critical strain for the onset of dynamic recrystallization using a hyperbolic tangent function , 2014 .

[25]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[26]  D. V. Wilson,et al.  Representation of material behaviour in finite element methods of modelling sheet forming processes , 1990 .

[27]  Adib A. Becker,et al.  Fast mapping of finite element field variables between meshes with different densities and element types , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[28]  Fpt Frank Baaijens Calculation of residual stresses in injection molded products , 1991 .

[29]  Seung-Yong Yang,et al.  Conversion of ABAQUS user Material Subroutines , 2010 .

[30]  Klaus Wolf,et al.  MpCCI: Neutral Interfaces for Multiphysics Simulations , 2017, Scientific Computing and Algorithms in Industrial Simulations.

[31]  Tamas Havar,et al.  Finite element mapping for incompatible FE meshes of composite structures , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  Jung-Wuk Hong,et al.  On the Reliable Solution of Contact Problems in Engineering Design , 2004 .

[33]  J. Huétink,et al.  Multi-stage metal forming: Variation and transformation , 2009 .

[34]  Eugene A. Olevsky,et al.  Theory of sintering: from discrete to continuum , 1998 .

[35]  S. Solhjoo Determination of critical strain for initiation of dynamic recrystallization , 2010 .