Audio–Vision Substitution for Blind Individuals: Addressing Human Information Processing Capacity Limitations

In this contribution, we consider the factors that influence the information processing capacity of the person using sensory substitution devices, and the influence of how the translated information, here in audio, impacts performance. First, we review aspects of vision substitution by tactile and audio devices, and then we review key theory in human information processing limitations to devise and test use of an audio-vision substitution device, The vOICe, for recognizing visual objects with audio substitution for vision. Participants heard sonifications of two-dimensional (2-D) images and had to match them to alternatives presented either in visual or tactile modalities. To assess whether capacity limits constrain performance, objects were either presented with all information simultaneously (top and bottom as whole objects), or successively (top and bottom of the object one after the other). Performance was superior in the successive trials, indicative of a capacity limit in processing the auditory information. We discuss the implications for training protocols and design to provide a useful accessibility device for blind individuals.

[1]  D Deutsch,et al.  Comments and reply on "Selective attention: perception or response? , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  D. Pascolini,et al.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010 , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  Ebroul Izquierdo,et al.  Reading Users' Minds From Their Eyes: A Method for Implicit Image Annotation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[5]  F A Saunders,et al.  A TACTILE VISION SUBSTITUTION SYSTEM* , 1969, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  A. Volder,et al.  Pattern recognition using a device substituting audition for vision in blindfolded sighted subjects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Mladejovsky,et al.  Artificial Vision for the Blind: Electrical Stimulation of Visual Cortex Offers Hope for a Functional Prosthesis , 1974, Science.

[8]  C. Trullemans,et al.  A real-time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Roland Thewes,et al.  Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  How well do you see what you hear? The acuity of visual-to-auditory sensory substitution , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Michael J Proulx,et al.  Does apparent size capture attention in visual search? Evidence from the Muller-Lyer illusion. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[12]  C. R. Snyder Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  L E Marks,et al.  On cross-modal similarity: auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  Selective Attention: Perception or Response? , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Benoît Gérard,et al.  Pattern recognition with the optic nerve visual prosthesis. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[20]  Jung-Kyong Kim,et al.  Generalized Learning of Visual-to-auditory Substitution in Sighted Individuals , 2008 .

[21]  H. Pashler,et al.  Are there capacity limitations in symmetry perception? , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with peripheral and central vestibular loss. , 2007, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[24]  P. Bach-y-Rita Tactile Sensory Substitution Studies , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  C. Spence,et al.  The suppression of reflexive visual and auditory orienting when attention is otherwise engaged. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Thomas Laube,et al.  Acute electrical stimulation of the human retina with an epiretinal electrode array , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[27]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[29]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  Individual Differences and Metacognitive Knowledge of Visual Search Strategy , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  Andrew J. R. Simpson,et al.  Visual objects in the auditory system in sensory substitution: how much information do we need? , 2014, Multisensory research.

[31]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Load-induced inattentional deafness , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Sandra Murphy,et al.  Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing , 2013, Cognition.

[33]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Jung-Kyong Kim,et al.  Can you hear shapes you touch? , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  C. Kufta,et al.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  L. Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Ron Kupers,et al.  Tactile–‘visual’ acuity of the tongue in early blind individuals , 2007, Neuroreport.

[38]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Seeing ‘Where’ through the Ears: Effects of Learning-by-Doing and Long-Term Sensory Deprivation on Localization Based on Image-to-Sound Substitution , 2008, PloS one.

[39]  John T Serences,et al.  Searching for an Oddball: Neural Correlates of Singleton Detection Mode in Parietal Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  John Palmer,et al.  Evidence of unlimited-capacity surface completion. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  EyeMusic: Introducing a "visual" colorful experience for the blind using auditory sensory substitution. , 2014, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[42]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[44]  Diana Deutsch,et al.  Comments on “Selective Attention: Perception or Response?” Reply , 1967 .

[45]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[46]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[47]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Information available In brief tactile presentations , 1966 .

[48]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in visual awareness , 2006, Brain Research.

[49]  Michael J Proulx,et al.  Turning on the Spotlight: Do Attention and Luminance Contrast Affect Neuronal Responses in the Same Way? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Load Induced Blindness , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  M. Proulx Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Dawei Shen,et al.  Effect of distractor sounds on the auditory attentional blink , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  J Miller,et al.  Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  H. Pashler,et al.  Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search , 2005, Cognition.

[57]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  Ron Kupers,et al.  Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals , 2011, Neuroreport.

[59]  Maurits Ortmanns,et al.  A Neural Stimulator Frontend With High-Voltage Compliance and Programmable Pulse Shape for Epiretinal Implants , 2012, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[60]  M. Ptito,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[61]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.

[62]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  Size Matters: Large Objects Capture Attention in Visual Search , 2010, PloS one.

[63]  Amir Amedi,et al.  ‘Visual’ Acuity of the Congenitally Blind Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution , 2012, PloS one.

[64]  John Palmer,et al.  Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[65]  A. Treisman,et al.  Is selective attention selective perception or selective response? A further test. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  H. Egeth,et al.  Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  D. Norman Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .

[68]  D. J. Warren,et al.  A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis , 1999, Vision Research.

[69]  G S Brindley,et al.  The visual sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the medial occipital cortex. , 1968, Journal of Physiology.

[70]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Seeing with Sound? Exploring Different Characteristics of a Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution Device , 2011, Perception.

[71]  C. Kufta,et al.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex , 1996 .