Agent-Based Models of Strategies for the Emergence and Evolution of Grammatical Agreement

Grammatical agreement means that features associated with one linguistic unit (for example number or gender) become associated with another unit and then possibly overtly expressed, typically with morphological markers. It is one of the key mechanisms used in many languages to show that certain linguistic units within an utterance grammatically depend on each other. Agreement systems are puzzling because they can be highly complex in terms of what features they use and how they are expressed. Moreover, agreement systems have undergone considerable change in the historical evolution of languages. This article presents language game models with populations of agents in order to find out for what reasons and by what cultural processes and cognitive strategies agreement systems arise. It demonstrates that agreement systems are motivated by the need to minimize combinatorial search and semantic ambiguity, and it shows, for the first time, that once a population of agents adopts a strategy to invent, acquire and coordinate meaningful markers through social learning, linguistic self-organization leads to the spontaneous emergence and cultural transmission of an agreement system. The article also demonstrates how attested grammaticalization phenomena, such as phonetic reduction and conventionalized use of agreement markers, happens as a side effect of additional economizing principles, in particular minimization of articulatory effort and reduction of the marker inventory. More generally, the article illustrates a novel approach for studying how key features of human languages might emerge.

[1]  E. Bell,et al.  The Iterated Exponential Integers , 1938 .

[2]  W. E. Welmers African Language Structures , 1974 .

[3]  R. Dixon Where Have all the Adjectives Gone , 1977 .

[4]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[5]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Ecphoric processes in episodic memory , 1983 .

[6]  A. Kemenade Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English , 1987 .

[7]  C. A. Ferguson,et al.  Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions , 1990 .

[8]  Luc Steels,et al.  A Self-Organizing Spatial Vocabulary , 1995, Artificial Life.

[9]  C. Lehmann Thoughts on Grammaticalization , 2015 .

[10]  F. Newmeyer Language Form And Language Function , 1998 .

[11]  Luc Steels,et al.  Spatially Distributed Naming Games , 1998, Adv. Complex Syst..

[12]  Ann Copestake,et al.  Implementing typed feature structure grammars , 2001, CSLI lecture notes series.

[13]  L. Steels Evolving grounded communication for robots , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.  Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: new morphology and language contact , 2003 .

[15]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Iterated Learning: A Framework for the Emergence of Language , 2003, Artificial Life.

[16]  Luc Steels,et al.  The Origins of Ontologies and Communication Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[17]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[18]  Eric Fuß The rise of agreement , 2005 .

[19]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Irit Meir,et al.  Morphological universals and the sign language type , 2005 .

[21]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Journal of Statistical Mechanics: An IOP and SISSA journal Theory and Experiment Sharp transition towardsshared vocabularies in multi-agent systems , 2006 .

[22]  L. Steels,et al.  coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: a case study for colour , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  K. Tuyls,et al.  How to reach linguistic consensus: a proof of convergence for the naming game. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement , 2007 .

[27]  Luc Steels,et al.  Flexible word meaning in embodied agents , 2008, Connect. Sci..

[28]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Syntax of Agreement and Concord , 2008 .

[29]  Louisa Sadler,et al.  Indeterminacy by underspecification , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[30]  Guido Boella,et al.  Normative framework for normative system change , 2009, AAMAS 2009.

[31]  Jóhanna Barðdal The development of case in Germanic , 2009 .

[32]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Diversity, competition, extinction: the ecophysics of language change , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Modeling the emergence of universality in color naming patterns , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  An Old High-German Primer , 2010 .

[35]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Statistical physics of language dynamics , 2011 .

[36]  L. Steels Modeling the cultural evolution of language. , 2011, Physics of life reviews.

[37]  Luc Steels,et al.  Design patterns in fluid construction grammar , 2011 .

[38]  K. Aaron Smith,et al.  Grammaticalization , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[39]  Silvia Luraghi,et al.  The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations , 2011 .

[40]  Janet Wiles,et al.  Lingodroids: socially grounding place names in privately grounded cognitive maps , 2011, Adapt. Behav..

[41]  Remi van Trijp Feature Matrices and Agreement: A Case Study for German Case , 2011 .

[42]  V. Isaeva Self-organization in biological systems , 2012, Biology Bulletin.

[43]  Paul Vogt Exploring the Robustness of Cross-Situational Learning Under Zipfian Distributions , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  Remi van Trijp Self-Assessing Agents for Explaining Language Change: A Case Study in German , 2012, ECAI.